Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: The Panny xr 45 in perspective: should I replace my 1995 - 70w/c Yamaha receiver? posted by hinduclient on January 30, 2004 at 05:46:23:
Yamaha sucks, big time, anythings better than that.
The worst sounding stuff I have ever owned has been Yamaha.
And you are here asking if the Panasonic SA XR 45 is "better" that a stinking Yamaha receiver ?
People have been replacing mega buck stuff with the Panasonic my friend, better read the threads.
And its not all that shabby through the Analog Inputs,, just not quite as outstanding as when the signal is kept entirely in the digital domain.
I have had more Yamaha shit then I care to admit, and none of it was worth a fuk in my opinion.
I have had the amps with the red vertical flashing lights, the pre amps with the variable loudness controls, and several pro logic and dolbe digital receivers.
I think Yamaha is the absolute worst sounding shit I have ever heard, and thats being nice.
Cold, clinical, harsh, w/o image, anemic, thats the Yamaha sound.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Get Real ! - ka7niq 01/30/0419:43:26 01/30/04 (11)
- Analog inputs on panny - longtimequadowner 14:30:02 02/2/04 (1)
- "all digital phono preamp" - shudder! (nt) - J North 17:37:26 02/2/04 (0)
- LOL! - AbeCollins 11:16:35 01/31/04 (1)
- Re: LOL! - J North 11:54:48 01/31/04 (0)
- Please tell us what you really think about Yamaha . . . - J North 23:26:25 01/30/04 (6)
- Re: Please tell us what you really think about Yamaha . . . - Todd Krieger 13:48:45 01/31/04 (1)
- Re: Please tell us what you really think about Yamaha . . . - ka7niq 16:43:34 01/31/04 (0)
- I thought they made motorcycles. - DrD 08:31:14 01/31/04 (1)
- The Panny will never sound as *REAL* as a Yamaha - J North 08:58:43 01/31/04 (0)
- HERE! HERE! - NEAR SOTA 05:01:16 01/31/04 (1)
- ????????? - Audio67 13:17:30 01/31/04 (0)