![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Interesting.... posted by AbeCollins on July 15, 2023 at 18:33:12:
The Panny receiver I mentioned I bought in 2002/3.The concept of bypassing DAC seems appealing especially with the increasing digital dominance due to streaming, etc. But I suppose the power amps would need different "front ends" to what they have typically got.
Unless I'm confused about it, I think NAD had some "direct digital" amps for a while, but I'm not spotting any of these in their current lineup.
NOT the 51st state, eh!?!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Nothing really new ... surprised we don't see it more today - Feanor 07/16/2304:31:11 07/16/23 (7)
- RE: Nothing really new ... surprised we don't see it more today - cawson@onetel.com 05:55:53 07/16/23 (6)
- I wasn't clear about that - Feanor 07:53:05 07/16/23 (5)
- RE: I wasn't clear about that - cawson@onetel.com 11:47:36 07/16/23 (4)
- It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - AbeCollins 13:14:07 07/16/23 (3)
- RE: It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - cawson@onetel.com 03:27:24 07/17/23 (1)
- It's more than the DAC itself: - Freo-1 18:33:44 07/19/23 (0)
- RE: It's pretty unique but not sure about that approach - voolston 17:25:44 07/16/23 (0)