![]() |
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Really? posted by longtimequadowner on January 24, 2004 at 18:28:27:
Over zealous reaction and poor logic leading to brutal assumptions by some.It is painfully obvious from this thread last week that Jackman is NOT Tyson and was not part of the listening session:
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/amp/messages/37081.htmlThen the real Jackman "clears the air" and reduces the Panny to the league that it really plays in with this post:
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/amp/messages/38090.htmlThen enter this *most confusing statement of the month* candidate a couple posts later: "Sounds to me like Jackman has been deluged with emails and requests, and is feeling a bit of audiophilia nervosa with symtoms ranging subtle disbelief to sweaty nightmares since the big demo day - maybe beginning to have doubts with all the ruckus caused"
What was that about right after Jackman declares his AVA gear clearly superior to the stock XR45? Chompin at the bit?Exactly *WHAT* are you referring to that "pisses" me off?
False rumour, speculation and assumption that tarnishes a small American audio manufacturer's products and places a mass produced HT receiver in a false light?I must also please plead with you to stop posting false accusations that I hate the Panny. I must repeat for the nth time that I LIKE THE PANNY XR45. I just happen to like every $1000+ amp that I have heard better.
As you are painfully aware, I do not own that Panny as IT HAS BEEN SOLD as per my repsonse to you in this post:
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/amp/messages/37156.html
I do not see how my sale of the Panny somehow bars me from posting my thoughts or from "clearing the air".Now let us return to enjoying our respective systems, it is sounding better than ever as I am sure yours is as well and that is the way the cookie crumbles . . .
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Really . . . - J North 01/24/0420:03:43 01/24/04 (18)
- Dont worry J North - RooX 09:16:14 01/25/04 (17)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Vinylrube-esque 10:49:30 01/25/04 (16)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Gmood1 11:16:12 01/25/04 (12)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Vinylrube-esque 11:37:28 01/25/04 (0)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Vinylrube-esque 11:36:28 01/25/04 (10)
- Have to disagree with that theory . . . - J North 14:23:06 01/25/04 (0)
- Dont worry J North - RooX 13:16:38 01/25/04 (8)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Gmood1 14:05:06 01/25/04 (7)
- analog cell phone - RooX 17:30:40 01/25/04 (0)
- He's happy, you are happy, so leave it at that! - J North 14:31:00 01/25/04 (4)
- I have no problem with that ! - Gmood1 15:04:32 01/25/04 (3)
- Great! - J North 15:40:45 01/25/04 (2)
- Re: Great! - Gmood1 16:27:03 01/25/04 (1)
- Ditto :>) (nt) - J North 16:40:37 01/25/04 (0)
- Can you hear me now...Can you hear me now!!! - Gmood1 14:13:28 01/25/04 (0)
- Re: Dont worry J North - J North 10:55:28 01/25/04 (2)
- Re: Dont worry J North - Vinylrube-esque 11:17:59 01/25/04 (1)
- Re: Dont worry J North - J North 13:57:06 01/25/04 (0)