|
Search of All Forums Enter your search criteria. Click here for tips on using our search |
For Sale Ads |
1: Tweakers' Asylum, Interesting idea (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2002-03-30, 18:32:26 (66.20.177.10)
A box w/in a box...hmmmm. .......
2: Tweakers' Asylum, Where to buy great looking small enclosures - NOT your typical box (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2002-03-29, 11:19:28 (66.20.177.16)
Is there anyone that sells really nice, beefy metal enclosures? I'm not talking about steel Hammond type cases...I'm talking about the kind of cases you see the highend audiophile grade companies use. .......
3: Tube DIY Asylum, Any comments or experience with this HPA? (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2002-03-24, 19:02:35 (66.20.176.17)
Seems like an inexpensive and straight forward HPA for a first timer, but I'd love to hear comments as to if there would be something better. Here's the link: .......
4: Tube DIY Asylum, First timer needs a power supply (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2002-03-24, 15:34:38 (66.20.176.17)
I'm looking to build a tube Headpone amp here soon. For right now, I want to just focus on building the power supply. But, I have a couple questions. Without knowing WHICH amp I'll build, how should I .......
5: Digital Drive, Re: transport to DAC protocol (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 11:59:53 (66.20.181.30)
"Are you at version 4.2?" Lost me there ;) "If you are really serious about this, then we are talking about a new protocol - transport to DAC. I was earlier opting for a really clean feed coming from .......
6: Digital Drive, Re: Question about transports (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 11:24:28 (66.20.181.30)
Mark: Well, the theme here seems to be data integrity. Whatever method chosen, it would HAVE to be a step-up from what's happening now....which is apparently NADA! First order of duty is to get rid of .......
7: Digital Drive, Re: Message to Rodney (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 11:05:52 (66.20.181.30)
Cyr: If I understand your question correctly, you are asking what can you do to alleviate this CDR reflectance issue. Well, only thing you can do is do a little research into finding out which type of .......
8: Digital Drive, Re: Question about transports (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 11:01:54 (66.20.181.30)
Mark: Hah! You got it! As far as buffering tho, that would imply error control/detection which would supply the ACKs. Even if it didn't do frame sequencing, it seems like a very simple error control t .......
9: Digital Drive, Re: 10x, 40x , makes no diff (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 10:32:42 (66.20.181.30)
so what we need is an app that not only verifies bit perfect copies but also verifies 'timing-perfect' copies, n'est pas? .......
10: Digital Drive, Re: SighMessage to Rodney (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 10:30:33 (66.20.181.30)
Cyr: The issue of CDR(W) compatibility arrises due to reflectivity issues. CDRWs are worst case due to the lower 'albedo'(reflectance) which means the head has a more difficult time interpreting the p .......
11: Digital Drive, Re: correction, question about transports (0.00)
Posted by ck42 on 2001-11-20, 10:24:46 (66.20.181.30)
Mark: This is essentially what is happening in any connectionless network protocol. Frames can arrive at the destination out of order and can even take different paths to get there...but it doesn't ma .......
Found total of 11 records, Query: , Author: ck42 in All Forums, Time: 0 sec.