|
Vinyl Asylum: Actually it's pretty obvious that you didn't read the entire thread! by Ray-o-Stat Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
For Sale Ads |
67.22.230.7
In Reply to: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital posted by Balance on December 4, 2005 at 08:29:26:
In my post, I clearly indicated that my spend on the analog side was over 3 times that of the digital and that this confirmed that digital was an incredible bargain!!!I consider my analog rig and my digital rig to be substantially equal in terms of overall sound quality and listening enjoyment.
Sure, there are nits to pick on both but they are damned close!!!I never left the analog camp, but I also have invested heavily in the digital camp over the years since I love music.
I have had many mis-steps along the way, but I finally reached a point where the digital rig is up to snuff. Also, this is not even close to the most expensive digital front-end I have tried. In fact, it's one of the cheapest!It's all a matter of numbers now. There is way more R&D investment going on in digital audio than in analog; and that's the way it should be. New music typically only comes in digital format, so it would be stupid to invest otherwise.
I'm gratified that advancements have come fast and furious to the point where even dyed-in-the-wool analog guys can sit and listen to music from a cd without being horrified!
Happy fishing :-)
cheers,
Send an instant karma to me...
-Ray
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Balance 08:29:26 12/4/05 ( 47)
- Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Queg 12:08:52 12/5/05 ( 0)
Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - John Elison 06:29:56 12/5/05 ( 2)
- To each his own! nt - risabet 18:20:24 12/5/05 ( 1)
- There ya go! (nt) - John Elison 21:52:27 12/5/05 ( 0)
My best-ever digital system cost way less than $1K - Dave Pogue 06:06:14 12/5/05 ( 0)
Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - Evil Seav 20:30:26 12/4/05 ( 0)
To me, my analog vs my digital is a toss up... - NewStevo 20:16:18 12/4/05 ( 0)
not really - OMalley 16:49:38 12/4/05 ( 0)
I've had the opportunity to test digital gear... - EdAInWestOC 16:41:33 12/4/05 ( 0)
Why I dumped $$$ into analog vs. digital. - Supernaught 16:37:45 12/4/05 ( 0)
Some of have compared more expensive digital front-ends to our analog front ends - rlindsa 15:54:19 12/4/05 ( 0)
Actually it's pretty obvious that you didn't read the entire thread! - Ray-o-Stat 12/4/05 14:30:09 12/4/05 ( 0)
a great number of CDPs are disposable. - hifitommy 13:24:06 12/4/05 ( 0)
Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - CAFC 11:43:45 12/4/05 ( 0)
I went up to $3500 digital front end, with SACD, still analog is better. - jdaniel 10:43:15 12/4/05 ( 0)
Your premise is flawed to start with, but . . . - HenryH 10:11:32 12/4/05 ( 7)
- wrong on all counts - redneckaudio 12:17:20 12/4/05 ( 0)
So your basically saying that to better Digital you need thousands spent on Vinyl, (n/t) - Balance 12:04:27 12/4/05 ( 5)
- No. Read my post again. . . if trolls can read, which I doubt. /nt\ - HenryH 12:43:20 12/4/05 ( 1)
- By attacking "trolls" are you really saying "stay out of this site"? - lpspinner 08:07:46 12/5/05 ( 0)
Re: So your basically saying that to better Digital you need thousands spent on Vinyl, (n/t) - CAFC 12:13:59 12/4/05 ( 2)
- I'm thinking the same thing. /nt\ - HenryH 12:43:58 12/4/05 ( 1)
- Not true. Also Henry, you add nothing to this thread - Balance 22:35:32 12/4/05 ( 0)
You have the cart before the horse - - kavakidd 08:58:01 12/4/05 ( 8)
- Yep... - JoeLip 21:44:11 12/4/05 ( 2)
- Re: Yep... - kavakidd 21:56:08 12/4/05 ( 1)
- Re: Yep... - JoeLip 12:11:38 12/5/05 ( 0)
Exactly! Also, quite a few of the "nuts" here don't have all that much tied up in our analog systems. - Dick Schneiders 11:49:12 12/4/05 ( 3)
- No question - many inexpensive analog systems - kavakidd 20:06:15 12/4/05 ( 1)
- Yes, sorry, I meant the original poster when I said "you". (n/t) - Dick Schneiders 03:52:08 12/5/05 ( 0)
Re: Exactly! Also, quite a few of the "nuts" here don't have all that much tied up in our analog systems. - fdrennen 12:05:36 12/4/05 ( 0)
You present a very good point of view that I never thought of and..... - Balance 10:06:27 12/4/05 ( 0)
This thread was dedicated to those ONLY who have a fraction spent on Digital compared to Analog. - Balance 08:53:37 12/4/05 ( 1)
- Sure they can ... - reelsmith. 08:58:47 12/4/05 ( 0)
Re: Precentage Thread Below - It's pretty obvious why your guys prefer Analog to Digital - mosin 08:49:53 12/4/05 ( 1)
- ditto - redneckaudio 12:18:52 12/4/05 ( 0)
No ... - reelsmith. 08:45:33 12/4/05 ( 2)
- Okay, then you have a right to speak, but the others, C'MON! (n/t) - Balance 08:51:00 12/4/05 ( 1)
- But your TT is far more expensive than your CDP (nt) - Supernaught 16:45:40 12/4/05 ( 0)
It's pretty obvious where you're going with this - Bersani 08:44:59 12/4/05 ( 7)
- LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Balance 08:49:38 12/4/05 ( 6)
- Re: LOL, you are partially correct but..... - Bersani 09:04:03 12/4/05 ( 0)
- Here's how it happened. - mosin 08:58:20 12/4/05 ( 4)
- What if it happened differently? - John Elison 22:24:01 12/5/05 ( 0)
- Re: Here's how it happened. - 33 1/3 13:34:23 12/4/05 ( 0)
Yup. - Bry 11:05:32 12/4/05 ( 1)
- me too - OMalley 19:25:45 12/4/05 ( 0)