|
Tubes Asylum: RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... by dimsal Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
For Sale Ads |
98.228.74.21
In Reply to: RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... posted by chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net on September 20, 2008 at 19:56:09:
No it doesn't make sense. You accuse me of something I didn't do.
I asked you to provide a link where Brent says that the tube he's talking about is 1578. Well, you failed to do this.
Perhaps he was talking about it, but nowhere on his page about 6SN7 tubes, the one I sent you and the one I was using for reference (http://www.audiotubes.com/6sn7.htm) where he's talking about 6H8C, there's any single mention of 1578. And that's my case, I don't have any other Brent's quotes accept that one from his page. That's why after reading it I decided to use it, not to promote something I don't sell.
Read my ad again, I don't say that I sell 1578. Period.
I don't understand what's your agenda? Why are you so envious and hostile?
Perhaps the fact that you're the tube dealer...
Anyway, I'm sorry if I offended anyone that wasn't my intention, just wanted to clear things and show that the quote I took from the page of Brent's site doesn't mention 1578 at all. That's it.
If Brent does in fact based his impressions of 6H8C entirely on 1578 he should explicitly say so. BTW, he sells 6H8C on the same page down the bottom of the page and again it doesn't say it's 1578 that he sells. If he sell 1578 he should say so again. I don't have anything against Brent just wanted to show that there's nothing about 1578 on his page.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Rare Version 6H8C Russian Military 6SN7GT, Nickel Base Tubes (NOS) - chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net 07:25:10 09/20/08 ( 12)
- RE: Rare Version 6H8C Russian Military 6SN7GT, Nickel Base Tubes (NOS) - Fred Boltman 02:12:33 06/22/11 ( 0)
- RE: Rare Version 6H8C Russian Military 6SN7GT, Nickel Base Tubes (NOS) - Voiceofreason 17:08:44 07/2/11 ( 0)
Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - LineArrayNut 11:23:19 09/20/08 ( 11)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net 18:15:18 09/20/08 ( 10)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - dimsal 19:18:02 09/20/08 ( 9)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net 19:49:29 09/20/08 ( 0)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - LineArrayNut 19:38:22 09/20/08 ( 0)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - dimsal 19:21:52 09/20/08 ( 6)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net 19:56:09 09/20/08 ( 5)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - dimsal 09/21/08 06:23:50 09/21/08 ( 4)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - chowbeardog@sbcglobal.net 07:33:25 09/21/08 ( 3)
- The whole quote - Tre' 13:22:16 09/25/08 ( 1)
- RE: The whole quote - Palustris 10:08:07 06/26/11 ( 0)
- RE: The whole quote - manfred 09:53:49 09/29/08 ( 0)
- RE: Agreed, it's not a 1578 unless it's stamped "1578" , but... - dimsal 10:07:41 09/21/08 ( 0)