Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Computer Audio Asylum: RE: Better duck under that desk; by riboge

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

RE: Better duck under that desk;

70.181.185.2


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread:  [ Display   All   Email ] [ Computer Audio Asylum ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

It's not that you SHOULD train yourself thus, it's that many audiophiles DO to one degree or another and as a result can distinguish what others don't. Some studies may have used more experienced people but that is a far cry from determining how trained each is and matching result to level of training. The point is that you doubt people distinguish with what you consider music what is distinguished with test tones. I say it depends on who, with what training, experience of that kind of music, etc, in addition to whether the test psychological set and conditions are conducive to it.

On a different level, you seem to foolishly claim you are the arbiter of what in the sound presented is the music and what is something else you find worthless or even negative. It's hard to see how hearing more can ever be worse than hearing less of what is presented. What you enjoy is an even more idiosyncratic matter. Some people enjoy the deafening most of all and dislike lower volumes that actually allow one to hear what's playing.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  



Topic - 44.1 kHz shown scientifically to be inadequate - Tony Lauck 19:26:14 07/26/09 ( 72)