Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

I'm very happy with my slightly modified 1.6's

212.251.28.32

In Reply to: 1.6Q Vs. MG12 or MMG posted by GeorgeN on January 28, 2004 at 11:00:31:

I have them in an acousticaly bad room (50 sq.m.)driving them with a CODA 11 and I think I have found Nirvana! The system plays the 90% of the types of music excellent at db's I cannot bare. It is very involving and communicative without being extremely soft. It is dynamic and gentle in the right proportions.
Off course I've heard and wanted 3.6's but apart from the higher extension and cleaner treble, I think the price difference between 1.6-3.6 doesn't justify its cost.
It is the first time I don't have the "upgraditis" virus where it regards power amp-speakers.
I believe that whatever you choose you can't go wrong.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers

[ K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers Forum ]

Topic - 1.6Q Vs. MG12 or MMG - GeorgeN 11:00:31 01/28/04 ( 6)

I'm very happy with my slightly modified 1.6's - painter 01/28/04 22:29:34 01/28/04 ( 0)
unfair question - Green Lantern 18:37:04 01/28/04 ( 0)
I don't think it's that simple - D.B.. 15:52:45 01/28/04 ( 1)
- Good answer, thanks...(nt) - GeorgeN 17:35:23 01/28/04 ( 0)
Re: 1.6Q Vs. MG12 or MMG - Duke 11:57:47 01/28/04 ( 1)
- Re: yes, but... - rico 12:40:54 01/28/04 ( 0)