|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum: Re: We disagree on a couple of points by EGeddes Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
For Sale Ads |
69.209.182.145
In Reply to: Re: We disagree on a couple of points posted by tomservo on February 22, 2006 at 09:37:17:
TomAbout the horns I think that we are agree for the most part. Clearly the LF horn will have lower distortion at higher levels than a direct radiator, but just as clearly it will have more coloration from the internal standing waves than the direct radiator at any level. Now which is the greater problem and hence the better tradeoff. For home use I claim that LF distortion is not really a problem at all, but the horns colloration will be. Size isn't really the issue.
At some point, and here is where we probably disgaree, the disortion will become a greater problem than the coloration - if we are limited to a single driver. Then the horn is the better tradeoff - if you are limited to only the one driver. But one can always throw more drivers at the problem to get the distortion down, but the colloration is always in the horn.
But about the distortion topic I don't think that you have got what I am saying correct.
"There are your findings based on the results of your study which (I have not read it yet but I will) which finds a MUCH higher level of distortion is needed to be detectable with selected music
(a criteria for a subjectively flawless musical reproducer).So is distortion or nonlinearity above some amount audible or not ?"
We did not find "much higher levels of distortion", we found no relationship between the standard methods of specifying this distortion and its perception. Yes, distortion and nonlinearity is clearly audible. But the issue is that one cannot determine this aidibilty from THD or IMD tests. One finds that .01% THD can sound awful in one circumstance while 50% THD can be inaudible in another. So the point is that THD and IMD are useless as indicators of audiblity. Or proposed metric was shown to be highly correlated with perception - about .95 versus THD at -.2. This data is all on my web site.
And we tested even versus odd distortion in our test and found no differences.Now we did not test every single circumstance that one can come up with. We did not test for differences between LF and HF perception. It was a simple test, but sufficient to deflate a lot of "current dogma". The low results for THD and IMD means that these cannot be relied upon as indicators of perception. They may work in certain instances, but clearly they don't in others. Thus they can not be relied on.
The nature of these kinds of subjective tests is such that they tend to only be able to discard concepts and virtually never result in showing the answer. Thus to get to the answer one can only do this by discarding everything else and as such one can never be sure that they have discarded everything else. So there is never really an absolute answer, but there can be absolute errors.
Talk to you later.
Earl Geddes
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 08:11:26 02/18/06 ( 85)
- driver parameters off ?... - coolin 07:32:17 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Modeling - dwkurfma 11:39:54 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: driver parameters off ?... - Volvotreter 10:54:09 02/19/06 ( 0)
What I said before - EGeddes 19:08:35 02/18/06 ( 62)
- Re: What I said before -- ultra what-if question - freddyi 05:57:15 02/19/06 ( 61)
- Re: What I said before -- ultra what-if question - Scholl 14:00:03 02/19/06 ( 0)
- Love "GodZilla vs. Stone Cold" :-) - Homme De Terre 13:20:07 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Addendum on "IE" - Homme De Terre 13:40:34 02/19/06 ( 0)
LF horns - EGeddes 08:04:15 02/19/06 ( 57)
- Bass horns work great - Kloss 04:47:26 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - tomservo 15:59:56 02/19/06 ( 35)
- We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 16:49:34 02/19/06 ( 34)
- Wait just a minute.... - Jon Risch 17:39:44 02/23/06 ( 3)
- Re: Wait just a minute.... - EGeddes 18:44:12 02/23/06 ( 0)
- Re: Wait just a minute.... - EGeddes 18:40:11 02/23/06 ( 1)
- I read it again, and.... - Jon Risch 19:31:21 02/26/06 ( 0)
JAES Article - dwkurfma 20:31:01 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: JAES Article - EGeddes 05:40:46 02/20/06 ( 3)
- Re: JAES Article - dwkurfma 11:32:51 02/20/06 ( 2)
- Good paper - EGeddes 12:06:48 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: JAES Article - EGeddes 11:59:35 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 20:11:02 02/19/06 ( 24)
- One more thing - EGeddes 06:54:53 02/20/06 ( 7)
- so the only right way is a CD horn with your 15in bass cab? - Kloss 04:04:58 02/21/06 ( 6)
- Its the best way - EGeddes 05:36:59 02/21/06 ( 5)
- Good, I'll buy a Peavey - Tom Brennan 06:40:03 02/21/06 ( 4)
- Actually - Jon Risch 16:54:01 02/23/06 ( 2)
- Yeah, but those are $1400 EACH! - Ivan303 16:58:39 02/24/06 ( 1)
- Naw - Jon Risch 10:06:03 02/27/06 ( 0)
- Thxs Tom was going to get EGeddes loudspeakers - Kloss 08:00:48 02/21/06 ( 0)
Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 05:37:42 02/20/06 ( 15)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 06:52:44 02/20/06 ( 14)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 07:04:16 02/20/06 ( 13)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 11:18:26 02/20/06 ( 12)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 11:57:31 02/20/06 ( 11)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - eso 15:29:00 02/20/06 ( 1)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 15:58:36 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 14:52:28 02/20/06 ( 8)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 16:19:03 02/20/06 ( 7)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 17:58:56 02/20/06 ( 6)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 18:29:05 02/20/06 ( 5)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 09:37:17 02/22/06 ( 1)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 02/22/06 11:00:41 02/22/06 ( 0)
- Re: A words on context, or lack thereof... - eso 22:29:04 02/20/06 ( 0)
- a couple of dumb questions - pg 20:06:00 02/20/06 ( 1)
- This is a subjective question - EGeddes 05:33:59 02/21/06 ( 0)
Re: "no way to make a "good" and practical LF horn." - Ivan303 09:37:42 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Re: "no way to make a "good" and practical LF horn." - EGeddes 12:55:48 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - Tom Brennan 09:12:08 02/19/06 ( 17)
- First off - EGeddes 13:09:20 02/19/06 ( 7)
- Re: First off - Tom Brennan 15:02:14 02/19/06 ( 6)
- Thanks Tom - EGeddes 16:11:54 02/19/06 ( 0)
- Geez Tom.... - Homme De Terre 15:32:17 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: Geez Tom.... - Tom Brennan 18:19:15 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Re: I still miss Mike Bates and Romy. - Ivan303 19:30:52 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Re: I still miss Mike Bates and Romy. - eso 21:58:57 02/21/06 ( 0)
- Manfred actually means "Man of Peace", did you know that? :-)(nt) - Homme De Terre 18:23:11 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - Rapid 10:03:23 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Re: LF horns - Tom Brennan 11:33:39 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Re: LF horns - Steve Eddy 11:48:31 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Toupee...err...touché. :-D (nt) - Homme De Terre 13:23:47 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - eso 09:34:00 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - Don Bunce 18:16:11 02/21/06 ( 1)
- Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - eso 21:53:41 02/21/06 ( 0)
Iam glad this forum exists to save me from myself. - Kloss 05:18:09 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer...stay-free mini-pad? - freddyi 09:39:13 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - John Sheerin 14:43:46 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - eso 08:52:54 02/18/06 ( 10)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - EGeddes 19:04:11 02/18/06 ( 5)
- Measuring horns... - Rapid 03:23:50 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: Measuring horns... - EGeddes 07:57:34 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Interesting... - Rapid 09:57:28 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Re: Interesting... - EGeddes 13:00:22 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Thanks (nt) - Rapid 13:23:15 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 12:28:22 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 09:03:27 02/18/06 ( 2)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - eso 09:11:51 02/18/06 ( 1)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 09:31:51 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Walt 08:24:28 02/18/06 ( 6)
- second generation pictures? - coolin 07:50:16 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Never mind.. - coolin 07:53:34 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 12:32:44 02/18/06 ( 2)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Walt 14:17:42 02/18/06 ( 1)
- Hi walt - toxicport.e 17:33:38 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 08:37:16 02/18/06 ( 0)