|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum: Re: We disagree on a couple of points by tomservo Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
For Sale Ads |
204.87.188.85
In Reply to: Re: We disagree on a couple of points posted by EGeddes on February 20, 2006 at 05:37:42:
Hi EarlNot to pick nits but looking at the hearing sensitivity curves one can easily see why ones ears are not as sensitive to distortion at higher frequencies, conversely, one would also conclude that at low frequencies, that one is MORE sensitive to distortion, not less.
For example, Dolby labs (Benjamin and Fielder (sp)) did a paper many years ago on subwoofer performance.
They concluded, that there weren’t any home subwoofers which could produce audible 20Hz, without audible distortion.
Because of the hearing sensitivity curve, one finds that at the threshold of hearing, at 20Hz, that a 3rd harmonic of only 7% has an EQUAL subjective loudness as the fundamental at 20Hz.
Clean low bass is not easy, it is very hard.I think it is more an issue of “if†a mfr chooses to make it an issue, not, “if†linearity is fully irrelevant.
If your talking about differences you can easily hear, it does seem to matter at least in the lower 2/3 of the spectrum.
I wasn’t aware the discussion was limited to spouse friendly living rooms, rather it was “if†a bass horn was practical or not.“This is not what the scientific data saysâ€.
I have originated a number of novel solutions for technical problems for Scientists and PHD’s by following what I observed in the actual circumstance. I am comfortable following what I see even if on the surface it contradicts what is “knownâ€. First hand I found many academics don’t try things because they “know†it won’t work, yet sometimes there are exceptions to the rules, or the circumstances are “enough†different..
That aspect was actually fun at times, I originated all but one of that companies patents in the process.I mention the BT-7 as it is a bass horn. Yes, it has a rotary motor, “back then†it was totally impossible to arrive at the proper parameters with a VC driver.
From the electrical terminals, one would not see anything different that a pair of 15â€s with the same combined parameters, its electromechanical action as a driver is identical, it simply uses a rotary motor and rotary to linear converter instead of a VC.
My point was, the acoustic path contributes very little so far as distortion, most of it is the driver and at that it is primarily associated with motion.
I simply don’t have high level distortion measurements on the new products, which do use a conventional driver(s) to refer to.Disagreement is not bad, it would be pretty dull if everyone had the same experiences and saw everything the same way. Sometimes progress can even be the result from seeing things differently.
Best,Tom
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 08:11:26 02/18/06 ( 85)
- driver parameters off ?... - coolin 07:32:17 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Modeling - dwkurfma 11:39:54 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: driver parameters off ?... - Volvotreter 10:54:09 02/19/06 ( 0)
What I said before - EGeddes 19:08:35 02/18/06 ( 62)
- Re: What I said before -- ultra what-if question - freddyi 05:57:15 02/19/06 ( 61)
- Re: What I said before -- ultra what-if question - Scholl 14:00:03 02/19/06 ( 0)
- Love "GodZilla vs. Stone Cold" :-) - Homme De Terre 13:20:07 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Addendum on "IE" - Homme De Terre 13:40:34 02/19/06 ( 0)
LF horns - EGeddes 08:04:15 02/19/06 ( 57)
- Bass horns work great - Kloss 04:47:26 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - tomservo 15:59:56 02/19/06 ( 35)
- We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 16:49:34 02/19/06 ( 34)
- Wait just a minute.... - Jon Risch 17:39:44 02/23/06 ( 3)
- Re: Wait just a minute.... - EGeddes 18:44:12 02/23/06 ( 0)
- Re: Wait just a minute.... - EGeddes 18:40:11 02/23/06 ( 1)
- I read it again, and.... - Jon Risch 19:31:21 02/26/06 ( 0)
JAES Article - dwkurfma 20:31:01 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: JAES Article - EGeddes 05:40:46 02/20/06 ( 3)
- Re: JAES Article - dwkurfma 11:32:51 02/20/06 ( 2)
- Good paper - EGeddes 12:06:48 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: JAES Article - EGeddes 11:59:35 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 20:11:02 02/19/06 ( 24)
- One more thing - EGeddes 06:54:53 02/20/06 ( 7)
- so the only right way is a CD horn with your 15in bass cab? - Kloss 04:04:58 02/21/06 ( 6)
- Its the best way - EGeddes 05:36:59 02/21/06 ( 5)
- Good, I'll buy a Peavey - Tom Brennan 06:40:03 02/21/06 ( 4)
- Actually - Jon Risch 16:54:01 02/23/06 ( 2)
- Yeah, but those are $1400 EACH! - Ivan303 16:58:39 02/24/06 ( 1)
- Naw - Jon Risch 10:06:03 02/27/06 ( 0)
- Thxs Tom was going to get EGeddes loudspeakers - Kloss 08:00:48 02/21/06 ( 0)
Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 05:37:42 02/20/06 ( 15)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 02/20/06 06:52:44 02/20/06 ( 14)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 07:04:16 02/20/06 ( 13)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 11:18:26 02/20/06 ( 12)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 11:57:31 02/20/06 ( 11)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - eso 15:29:00 02/20/06 ( 1)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 15:58:36 02/20/06 ( 0)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 14:52:28 02/20/06 ( 8)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 16:19:03 02/20/06 ( 7)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 17:58:56 02/20/06 ( 6)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 18:29:05 02/20/06 ( 5)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - tomservo 09:37:17 02/22/06 ( 1)
- Re: We disagree on a couple of points - EGeddes 11:00:41 02/22/06 ( 0)
- Re: A words on context, or lack thereof... - eso 22:29:04 02/20/06 ( 0)
- a couple of dumb questions - pg 20:06:00 02/20/06 ( 1)
- This is a subjective question - EGeddes 05:33:59 02/21/06 ( 0)
Re: "no way to make a "good" and practical LF horn." - Ivan303 09:37:42 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Re: "no way to make a "good" and practical LF horn." - EGeddes 12:55:48 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - Tom Brennan 09:12:08 02/19/06 ( 17)
- First off - EGeddes 13:09:20 02/19/06 ( 7)
- Re: First off - Tom Brennan 15:02:14 02/19/06 ( 6)
- Thanks Tom - EGeddes 16:11:54 02/19/06 ( 0)
- Geez Tom.... - Homme De Terre 15:32:17 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: Geez Tom.... - Tom Brennan 18:19:15 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Re: I still miss Mike Bates and Romy. - Ivan303 19:30:52 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Re: I still miss Mike Bates and Romy. - eso 21:58:57 02/21/06 ( 0)
- Manfred actually means "Man of Peace", did you know that? :-)(nt) - Homme De Terre 18:23:11 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: LF horns - Rapid 10:03:23 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Re: LF horns - Tom Brennan 11:33:39 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Re: LF horns - Steve Eddy 11:48:31 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Toupee...err...touché. :-D (nt) - Homme De Terre 13:23:47 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - eso 09:34:00 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - Don Bunce 18:16:11 02/21/06 ( 1)
- Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer... - eso 21:53:41 02/21/06 ( 0)
Iam glad this forum exists to save me from myself. - Kloss 05:18:09 02/20/06 ( 0)
Re: I just got out the 60lb jackhammer...stay-free mini-pad? - freddyi 09:39:13 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - John Sheerin 14:43:46 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - eso 08:52:54 02/18/06 ( 10)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - EGeddes 19:04:11 02/18/06 ( 5)
- Measuring horns... - Rapid 03:23:50 02/19/06 ( 4)
- Re: Measuring horns... - EGeddes 07:57:34 02/19/06 ( 3)
- Interesting... - Rapid 09:57:28 02/19/06 ( 2)
- Re: Interesting... - EGeddes 13:00:22 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Thanks (nt) - Rapid 13:23:15 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 12:28:22 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 09:03:27 02/18/06 ( 2)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - eso 09:11:51 02/18/06 ( 1)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 09:31:51 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Walt 08:24:28 02/18/06 ( 6)
- second generation pictures? - coolin 07:50:16 02/19/06 ( 1)
- Never mind.. - coolin 07:53:34 02/19/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Volvotreter 12:32:44 02/18/06 ( 2)
- Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - Walt 14:17:42 02/18/06 ( 1)
- Hi walt - toxicport.e 17:33:38 02/18/06 ( 0)
Re: Tractrix vs. hypex vs. conical - corrected (long with pictures) - freddyi 08:37:16 02/18/06 ( 0)