|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: I don't think you are being realistic at all. posted by Analog Scott on August 21, 2006 at 15:48:47:
Scott, I do understand and appreciate that my test was very unscientific. My understanding of some scientific/statistical testing methodologies is that you begin with a hypothesis, and then you take testing samples to see if you can show with reasonable certainty/confidence that the hypothesis is true or false.In addition to the protocols of the testing method, I wanted to get a sense from people such as yourself if the results of my casual/unscientific test could be perceived as compelling enough to warrant a real scientific test...that is, were the protocols "screwed up enough" to just flat out say that there was nothing there? Or were they interesting enough for someone such as yourself to say "the results, despite the protocols, are interesting enough to warrant further, more rigorous investigation"?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I don't think you are being realistic at all. - PhilNYC 08/22/0609:06:22 08/22/06 (1)
- Re: I don't think you are being realistic at all. - Analog Scott 10:13:45 08/22/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
