|
General Asylum: Re: No, that is incorrect by Jerry Parker General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
208.165.108.156
In Reply to: Re: I have listened to high end systems! posted by Adi on August 5, 2002 at 11:27:37:
I was not sent here to bash John, a user on another board told me to come here and be "schooled" by him. For the record, I am only 19 years old - I have not even graduated college. As for the math, none has been presented, therefore I have no idea whether I can follow it or not.My main questions are, what do in fact make audible sonic differences within amplifiers? Is it the power supply? What about the output transistors or tubes? Can't you even give me a simple explaination? I see it this way. I cannot hear a difference between amplifiers. I questioned this and asked knowledgeable people, some of which post on audioasylum. Everyone up to you has told me that the amplifier should not matter at low power levels. I mean look through my eyes for a minute, I have yet to hear a difference between amplifiers and was told by knowledgeable sources that what I was hearing was normal. Perhaps if you give me any kind of valid reason why I should think otherwise, I will research it further. Otherwise, all I have heard from amplifier supporters is that I should trust my ears, and well frankly that is not a good idea, since I cannot hear a difference anyways. Perhaps my hearing is truly poor, at least at hearing details anyways? I can hear up to 18khz, so upper frequency limits are not the issue, I am not deaf.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - A question for Mr. John Curl - Jerry Parker 08:13:41 08/4/02 ( 51)
- Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - rtbarr 21:38:00 08/5/02 ( 1)
- That was a nice read, thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 22:16:52 08/5/02 ( 0)
One Aspect (long) - Jon Risch 20:34:13 08/5/02 ( 0)
Think about it this way..... - Adi 10:52:04 08/5/02 ( 0)
Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:08:31 08/5/02 ( 0)
If a stranger calls you "Mr." on the net... - suits_me 23:08:42 08/4/02 ( 0)
Re: OK, guys... - Jerry Parker 21:59:29 08/4/02 ( 18)
- NO scientific basis - Adi 11:20:45 08/5/02 ( 0)
Are you serious?? - BrassMonkey 09:20:02 08/5/02 ( 1)
- Re: Are you serious?? - Analog Scott 17:45:08 08/5/02 ( 0)
Here's my advice. - orpheus 08:11:26 08/5/02 ( 2)
- Re: Here's my advice. - Jerry Parker 13:52:03 08/5/02 ( 1)
- Re: Here's my advice. - orpheus 09:29:54 08/6/02 ( 0)
Re: OK, guys... - john curl 22:44:58 08/4/02 ( 11)
- Re: I have listened to high end systems! - Jerry Parker 10:08:58 08/5/02 ( 10)
- Re: I have listened to high end systems! - john curl 10:38:21 08/5/02 ( 9)
- Re: I have listened to high end systems! - Adi 11:27:37 08/5/02 ( 8)
- Re: No, that is incorrect - Jerry Parker 08/5/02 13:31:01 08/5/02 ( 7)
- Re: No, that is incorrect - cdb 19:36:55 08/8/02 ( 1)
- Re: No, that is incorrect - Jerry Parker 20:33:54 08/8/02 ( 0)
- Re: No, that is incorrect - Analog Scott 17:55:05 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: No, that is incorrect - john curl 16:06:07 08/5/02 ( 2)
- Shame on you John - Adi 21:53:56 08/5/02 ( 1)
- Re: Grow Up - Jerry Parker 20:29:09 08/8/02 ( 0)
- Lucky you - Bruce from DC 14:38:20 08/5/02 ( 0)
So Jerry, now do you understand? - rupertdacat 19:51:05 08/4/02 ( 1)
- Re: So Jerry, now do you understand? - Dave-A 21:16:14 08/4/02 ( 0)
Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - Analog Scott 12:02:57 08/4/02 ( 0)
Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - rtbarr 11:02:16 08/4/02 ( 3)
- Thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 13:02:21 08/4/02 ( 0)
Great Link! - wheezer 12:32:42 08/4/02 ( 0)
Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - john curl 11:41:56 08/4/02 ( 0)
Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - john curl 11:00:11 08/4/02 ( 18)
- Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 23:29:26 08/4/02 ( 17)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - Analog Scott 17:57:42 08/5/02 ( 1)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 18:12:21 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - john curl 09:19:20 08/5/02 ( 3)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 10:16:13 08/5/02 ( 2)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - Analog Scott 18:06:32 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: Well, I would assume... - john curl 10:43:39 08/5/02 ( 0)
Test methods... - Estes 05:35:43 08/5/02 ( 2)
- Re: Well then... - Jerry Parker 07:40:15 08/5/02 ( 1)
- Re: Well then... - jeff mai 18:20:59 08/5/02 ( 0)
There are more conditions on this challenge... - jeff mai 02:58:00 08/5/02 ( 7)
- Re: Well.... - Jerry Parker 07:48:46 08/5/02 ( 6)
- Re: Well.... - jeff mai 16:31:34 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: Well.... - caa 13:27:01 08/5/02 ( 4)
- Re: Compromises - Jerry Parker 14:29:57 08/5/02 ( 3)
- Re: Compromises - Analog Scott 18:13:20 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: Compromises - caa 16:26:03 08/5/02 ( 0)
- Re: Compromises - john curl 16:20:04 08/5/02 ( 0)