|
Digital Drive: Re: DAC ratings? by Tze Teo Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
For Sale Ads |
141.211.78.115
In Reply to: DAC ratings? posted by Valnar on June 21, 2000 at 04:18:48:
Circuit board design and topology probably makes the most difference, as does the digital coaxial cable used.I tried Musical Fidelity's products, which use Burr Brown PCM 1706s, and I did not like them at all. Decided on Sony's own current pulse converters instead. In any case, those Burr Brown's claim 24bit resolution, but if I am correct Delta Sigma DACs are still 1bit devices.
Here's a question: Why do we seek to replace the DACs on DVD players, even those 24/96 ones, when many of those DACs we're looking at are Delta Sigma ones anyway? Bit for bit, literally, there should not be any noticable sonic difference would there? Okay, I do accept the circuit board and topology answer!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - DAC ratings? - Valnar 04:18:48 06/21/00 ( 8)
- Its not the DAC chip, but what you do with it that counts - JGRB 10:56:47 06/21/00 ( 0)
Re: DAC ratings? - Thorsten 10:28:52 06/21/00 ( 2)
- Re: DAC ratings? - Yves 08:00:13 06/28/00 ( 0)
DAC ratings? - Valnar 10:50:07 06/21/00 ( 0)
Re: DAC ratings? - Tze Teo 06/21/00 09:30:33 06/21/00 ( 0)
Re: DAC ratings? - bobwire 08:10:38 06/21/00 ( 0)
Re: DAC ratings? - Tom Berry 08:01:55 06/21/00 ( 1)
- Re: DAC ratings? - Valnar 10:37:12 06/21/00 ( 0)