|
Cable Asylum: Re: Thorsten..... by Thorsten Interconnects, speaker wire, power cords. Ask the Cable Guys. |
For Sale Ads |
195.107.47.228
In Reply to: Thorsten..... posted by SteveB on March 11, 2002 at 23:21:20:
Hi,> you start your post by asking us to face facts, then go on to
> provide none beyond a bit of basic chemistry.So, a bit of sanity is needed.
> You are not privvy to either cable company's manufacturing
> processes or sources of materials.No. However, I would suggest that you try finding someone who is able to reliably and based on industry standard techniques to certify ANY metal to more than four nines purity. Any claims of six nines are AFAIK pure Science Fiction as there is no real way to evaluate such purity. You may be able to get four nines silver, but it is going to be VERY hard. Try getting six nines....
> It would be trivial to draw cable under an inert atmosphere,
Would it? Ever been to suitable foundaries. I used to work in a Steelwork (servicing the process control systems) where very high grade steel was made, contious cast and in some cases under protective atmosphere. Trust me, it is NOT trivial. And if you are talking about smelting and refining any metal to such extreme purities as mentioned the whole process would have to be under protective atmospheres without any exposure to air EVER untill the wire is coated.
If the wire could really be PROVEN to be cemically 99.999999% copper (as claimed) the wire is worth any asking price simply for that.
> You have never listened to or evaluated either cable under
> consideration.That was not my point anyway. I have heard and read many claims of high purity metal use in cables and find them simply ludicrous. I'm not even singeling NO and HMS out here, the whole industry is guilty of playing this number game.
> Why not? I assume you have data to back up your claim, say a test
> of a single cable structure built using different metal purities
> and extrusion techniques.I have done exactly that. I found that higher purity metal was not inherently better, but long crystal contionous cast wire even of relatively poor purity (99.97%) was.
> Personally I've never read such an evaluation but would be
> interested to do so.Do one yourself. Get the wires - you can two or three nines copper magnet wire from several sources and lower purity almost anywhere, also continous cast wire (make sure to examine the crystal structure under a microscope if you are not sure) - of the same gauge and made the same interconnect with them.
I found also that prolonged burn in at elevated current levels severely reduced the differences between the different cables.
Later T
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - HMS VS VALHALLA-showdown-long - calloway 18:15:21 03/11/02 ( 37)
- How do you like your Tenor Amps? - Steve M 07:35:32 03/15/02 ( 0)
True test of HMS - Corbett 08:55:33 03/14/02 ( 3)
- Re: True test of HMS - Tekunda 10:52:30 03/14/02 ( 2)
- Re: True test of HMS - Corbett 14:05:20 03/14/02 ( 1)
- Re: True test of HMS - Tekunda 14:40:53 03/14/02 ( 0)
At last an informative post. Siltech G5? - Norm 08:43:26 03/12/02 ( 1)
- Re: At last an informative post. Siltech G5? - calloway 09:12:38 03/12/02 ( 0)
Re: HMS VS VALHALLA-showdown-long - GG 05:59:27 03/12/02 ( 1)
- Amen GG! <nt> - panorama 07:37:16 03/12/02 ( 0)
Impedence settings on HMS cables - JCS 04:19:05 03/12/02 ( 3)
- Re: Impedence settings on HMS cables - calloway 06:29:50 03/12/02 ( 2)
- Thanks - looking forward to your update. (nt) - JCS 13:00:38 03/12/02 ( 0)
- That would be great Calloway - panorama 07:33:03 03/12/02 ( 0)
Tech stuff only ... - JFreeman 23:52:43 03/11/02 ( 2)
- Re: Tech stuff only ... - highendman 20:18:12 03/12/02 ( 1)
- Re: Tech stuff only ... - JFreeman 03:22:51 03/13/02 ( 0)
Re: HMS VS VALHALLA-showdown-long - mikel 23:33:32 03/11/02 ( 1)
- Yes, appreciated. Thanks a lot (n/t) - SteveB 04:12:48 03/12/02 ( 0)
Thanks (nt) - jnr 23:16:05 03/11/02 ( 0)
Reality strikes VERY HARD....... - Thorsten 20:26:50 03/11/02 ( 10)
- Mr. Strassner's comments on conductor issues, like oxygen in copper. - Tekunda 07:18:24 03/12/02 ( 3)
- My point pretty much - Thorsten 09:08:58 03/13/02 ( 0)
- Re: Isn't that copper is NON magnetic? - KK 08:08:47 03/12/02 ( 1)
- I stand corrected: Its 3 ppm (parts per million) - Tekunda 08:24:39 03/12/02 ( 0)
Re: Reality strikes VERY HARD....... - RonyW 02:36:23 03/12/02 ( 0)
Thorsten..... - SteveB 23:21:20 03/11/02 ( 3)
- Re: Thorsten..... - Thorsten 03/12/02 04:10:07 03/12/02 ( 2)
- Re: Thorsten..... - lpcd2001 15:07:43 03/12/02 ( 1)
- Re: Thorsten..... - Thorsten 09:17:12 03/13/02 ( 0)
Re: Reality strikes VERY HARD....... - calloway 21:25:51 03/11/02 ( 0)
Excellent, - j_thunders 19:17:32 03/11/02 ( 0)
Re: HMS VS VALHALLA-showdown-long - HIFIADDICT 19:10:46 03/11/02 ( 3)
- Great point; cables are system dependant ... - Jack Seaton 06:16:24 03/12/02 ( 2)
- Re: Great point; cables are system dependant ... - Junvel 07:22:57 03/12/02 ( 1)
- Re: Great point; cables are system dependant ... - Jack Seaton 18:19:34 03/12/02 ( 0)
Any plans to audition HMS power cords? - Jon L 18:58:09 03/11/02 ( 1)
- Re: Any plans to audition HMS power cords? - calloway 19:08:44 03/11/02 ( 0)