Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: RE: NOS RCA 7591 is better. ~t posted by Jim McShane on April 9, 2010 at 08:48:50:
He can get them from me.
But, Yes they are a very spendy considering how so few are around these days, let alone a NOS quad.
Jim, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't I read somewhere in the past that the earlier version of Russian 7591A were really not 7591's but something else? Are these new ones the real deal?
If so, I would pick some up to run in my Fishers.
V/r
CW
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: NOS RCA 7591 is better. ~t - JSTRM 04/9/1008:55:25 04/9/10 (7)
- RE: NOS RCA 7591 is better. ~t - Jim McShane 09:09:29 04/9/10 (6)
- Jim, I have a Fisher 500C modified by Paul at Bizzy Bee. What - hiatt@alaska.net 14:04:00 04/9/10 (5)
- RE: Jim, I have a Fisher 500C modified by Paul at Bizzy Bee. What - Jim McShane 14:26:18 04/9/10 (3)
- RE: Jim, I have a Fisher 500C modified by Paul at Bizzy Bee. What - wdewolfe@pacourts.us 10:46:14 04/16/10 (1)
- RE: Jim, I have a Fisher 500C modified by Paul at Bizzy Bee. What - Jim McShane 05:34:11 04/22/10 (0)
- Thanks Jim again, and I assume the coupling caps are C87 and C88. - hiatt@alaska.net 17:01:17 04/9/10 (0)
- Jim, please disregard the above question about the selector - hiatt@alaska.net 14:06:41 04/9/10 (0)