In Reply to: RE: The importance of frequent tape deck exeercise. posted by Inmate51 on November 21, 2014 at 16:17:33:
You could be right, but your argument is foolish because you could also be wrong.
From time to time, I am given archival tapes to transfer to digital. In between my Nak CR-7 sits idle. When I get a job to do, do you think that the first tape I put into the deck is the rare tape to be archived? You have to be kidding! The first thing I do is to put into the deck a tape that I don't care about that sounded good the last time I played it. If it plays without drama and sounds good only then do I put in the rare archival tape.
It is possible that the old acetate tape in question turned to "dust" through the ravages of time and, perhaps, a poor storage environment. Of course were this to be the case, it would only be "anecdotal", a total cop-out phrase in my opinion. It is a phrase used by the non-discerning to dismiss in a dogmatic fashion the very clues that might enable them to advanced to be better world-view. But I know that acetate tapes can turn to dust, because I have several 4 track pre-recorded tapes that turned to dust as could be seen while threading the takeup reel on my R2R deck before I even pressed play and I could care less whether you believe me or not. I also know that tape decks have rubber parts that degrade over time and this can account for unreliable operation after a period of storage. (This is a particular failing of early Nak CR-7's that didn't have the rubber idler replaced by a gear mechanism.)
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The importance of frequent tape deck exeercise. - Tony Lauck 11/21/1417:01:49 11/21/14 (1)
- RE: The importance of frequent tape deck exeercise. - Inmate51 18:08:36 11/21/14 (0)