Re: correct! nt - Peter - Speaker Asylum

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - Mal P 01:36:27 03/29/05 (48)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - obiwan 04:35:01 03/31/05 (0)

When I measure SPL - MarkgM 23:01:56 03/29/05 (3)

Should have mentioned: when looking for peaks - MarkgM 06:03:26 03/30/05 (2)

Re: Should have mentioned: when looking for peaks - Mal P 19:19:16 03/30/05 (1)

Well, I'm curious what typical SPL measurements would be - MarkgM 22:12:22 03/30/05 (0)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - tomservo 09:35:52 03/29/05 (3)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - Mal P 14:50:36 03/29/05 (2)

People buy subwoofers to extend the frequency response of their main speakers - Richard BassNut Greene 08:05:12 03/30/05 (1)

Re: People buy subwoofers to extend the frequency response of their main speakers - Mal P 19:27:21 03/30/05 (0)

"difficult to drive" is mainly an audiophile urban myth along with 100's of hours for break-in - Richard BassNut Greene 08:15:37 03/29/05 (24)

You are kidding, right ??? NT - Lowrider 08:49:02 03/30/05 (12)

No, he is tragically serious.......... - michaelb 18:36:01 03/30/05 (11)

"I guess for small rooms with no bass reproduction needed in the 20-40HZ range" (what does that mean?) - Richard BassNut Greene 09:30:41 03/31/05 (10)

Personaly ? - Stale 18:33:22 04/4/05 (0)

Most people have lousy sound, particularly bass... - Lowrider 00:52:41 04/1/05 (2)

Re: Most people have lousy sound, particularly bass... - MarkgM 11:18:37 04/1/05 (1)

It is not a matter of power... - Lowrider 12:19:12 04/1/05 (0)

There is a difference between a Best Buy JLB and a High End Electrostat Speaker - michaelb 10:21:35 03/31/05 (5)

Wanting to believe that one's speakers are a "difficult load" and require "100's of hours" of break-in ... - Richard BassNut Greene 10:36:57 03/31/05 (4)

Number of Dynaudios w/ about 3 Ohms (nt) - Stale 18:30:46 04/4/05 (0)

sorry to tell you that there are a number of speakers that present loads that are difficult, and my receiver story - mark maloof 02:13:52 04/1/05 (0)

"Very Unusual" ? Well, here is a third example... - michaelb 11:22:42 03/31/05 (1)

As long as you're at it... - MarkgM 12:09:17 03/31/05 (0)

Re: "difficult to drive" is mainly an audiophile urban myth along with 100's of hours for break-in - Mal P 15:01:10 03/29/05 (3)

Re: "difficult to drive" is mainly an audiophile urban myth along with 100's of hours for break-in - hahax 19:43:03 03/29/05 (2)

Re: "difficult to drive" is mainly an audiophile urban myth along with 100's of hours for break-in - Mal P 20:28:20 03/29/05 (1)

But impdence is more important to tube amps than sensitivity. - mark maloof 02:22:53 04/1/05 (0)

Yeah, - one can't tell the difference with Lo-Fi gear -t - Sordidman 09:31:28 03/29/05 (6)

Re: Yeah, - one can't tell the difference with Lo-Fi gear -t - theaudiohobby 07:03:10 03/30/05 (5)

No, I'm cool, - what about you? -t - Sordidman 11:02:38 03/30/05 (4)

really? - theaudiohobby 02:50:22 03/31/05 (3)

yep......... - Sordidman 08:27:51 03/31/05 (2)

I have never implied that components don't break-in -- please don't misquote me - Richard BassNut Greene 09:44:23 03/31/05 (1)

A 10 minute break in? Vs What? - Sordidman 11:08:17 03/31/05 (0)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - Android 05:50:57 03/29/05 (13)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - Mal P 15:05:15 03/29/05 (0)

Re: Why is the bass part of a speaker so hard to drive? - Peter 12:51:25 03/29/05 (0)

Two things: wavelength and power. - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:01:25 03/29/05 (10)

Re: Two things: wavelength and power. - Ozzie 06:16:35 03/30/05 (0)

Totally incorrect! nt - Peter 12:42:50 03/29/05 (8)

Re: Totally incorrect! nt - Mal P 15:07:02 03/29/05 (7)

Re: Totally incorrect! nt - tomservo 18:39:23 03/29/05 (0)

Incorrect - MAP_ 16:26:39 03/29/05 (5)

Re: Incorrect - David Gallman 13:15:03 04/2/05 (0)

Re: correct! nt - Peter 03/30/0502:18:12 03/30/05 (0)

Re: Incorrect - Mal P 20:23:51 03/29/05 (2)

Re: Incorrect - obiwan 21:34:29 03/29/05 (1)

Re: Incorrect - Mal P 01:34:14 03/30/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: correct! nt - Peter 03/30/0502:18:12 03/30/05 (0)