|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Have nothing to add to the 'DSD Haters' club... posted by Ivan303 on January 23, 2016 at 15:30:00:
No need for MQA either. And I've heard some of his files that had to be remixed by converting from pure DSD back to PCM (352.8/32) and back to DXD because of artistic balance issues (a.k.a. ego of solo singers who wanted to be louder in the mix) and I can say unequivocally that the pure DSD recording was better.
The more DSP processing used, the worse the sound gets. The more clever the DSP "expert" is, the longer it takes the rest of us to figure out what is going on. MQA is the 21st century "Dynagroove".
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Have nothing to add to the 'DSD Haters' club... - Tony Lauck 01/25/1617:58:55 01/25/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
