|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: HQPlayer processing is better is not something that I understand posted by Mercman on December 18, 2015 at 12:37:14:
It's more than the filters. Filtering mostly affects the 44.1 kHz tracks. There is still a big difference with the high res PCM material. I think it's just that Miksa's modulators are better than the one in the SABRE chip. All modulators create artifacts and these can have subtle sonic effects that can be much more important than filter effects.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: HQPlayer processing is better is not something that I understand - Tony Lauck 12/18/1512:59:21 12/18/15 (4)
- RE: HQPlayer processing is better is not something that I understand - Mercman 13:01:53 12/18/15 (3)
- RE: HQPlayer processing is better is not something that I understand - Tony Lauck 13:12:16 12/18/15 (2)
- RE: HQPlayer processing is better is not something that I understand - Mercman 13:18:20 12/18/15 (1)
- ASIOs - fmak 23:41:08 12/18/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
