In Reply to: RE: 24/176.4 or 24/88.2 posted by maxim on August 2, 2015 at 12:49:03:
Ultrasonic noise is a problem when downsampling DSD to a lower sampling rate. If the filters do not prevent all aliasing, then the ultrasonic noise will fold down into the "audible band". On the other hand, if the filters do eliminate aliasing then the result may be filter artifacts and unintended loss of sound quality compared to the original DSD. The solution to this quandary is to avoid downsampling DSD to lower sampling rates. Get a DAC that will play these files in their original format. If this is not possible, then downsample them to the highest available sampling rate.
Given that you have to downsample them until you get a suitable DAC, then by all means use the highest sampling rate available. It will do the least damage. However, even going to 352.8 is not going to be transparent compared to the original DSD.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Neither, play the DSD. - Tony Lauck 08/2/1518:29:34 08/2/15 (8)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Kal Rubinson 15:24:54 08/3/15 (7)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Tony Lauck 19:35:28 08/3/15 (6)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Mr_Steady 17:27:26 08/5/15 (5)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Tony Lauck 17:36:51 08/5/15 (4)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Mr_Steady 18:08:54 08/5/15 (0)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Sprezza Tura 17:45:45 08/5/15 (2)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Tony Lauck 18:12:18 08/5/15 (1)
- RE: Neither, play the DSD. - Sprezza Tura 18:21:51 08/5/15 (0)