In Reply to: DLNA implementations not bit perfect? posted by AbeCollins on July 7, 2015 at 08:22:00:
Bit perfect includes gapless. Last I heard, DLNA was not gapless, except for certain combinations of tweaked products. (In other words, there was no specification that says if X talking to Y isn't gapless then there is a document which resolves either X or Y to be violating the DLNA agreement.)
This may have changed, as I looked into this some while ago.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- gapless? - Tony Lauck 07/7/1508:43:28 07/7/15 (5)
- RE: gapless? - Sprezza Tura 10:21:57 07/7/15 (4)
- RE: gapless? - Tony Lauck 11:06:27 07/7/15 (3)
- RE: gapless? - Dave_K 13:53:57 07/7/15 (1)
- RE: gapless? - Bob_C 14:19:35 07/7/15 (0)
- RE: gapless? - Sprezza Tura 11:11:57 07/7/15 (0)