In Reply to: RE: The -90 dB argument and the "H" word. posted by Jaundiced Ear on April 6, 2015 at 12:01:50:
I can not tell you anything about a test that I haven't taken. I don't believe in tests as a means of convincing skeptics. It is too easy to rig tests to prove whatever the experimenter wants to prove. I also know that even were I to pass such a test, then some of the "objectivists" would find something wrong with the test or the way I took it. Worse, if these objections could be removed, then the next step would be for them to accuse me of cheating. I have no interest in going down this path, lacking the requisite patience and tolerance of toxic personalities.
I do not believe in third party authorities. We must each be responsible for our own beliefs. Following this logic, I would disrespect anyone who were to accept me as their authority. They should be making their own determination, using their God given senses and God given mind.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The -90 dB argument and the "H" word. - Tony Lauck 04/6/1513:02:37 04/6/15 (3)
- RE: The -90 dB argument and the "H" word. - Jaundiced Ear 19:05:22 04/6/15 (2)
- RE: The -90 dB argument and the "H" word. - Tony Lauck 09:07:52 04/7/15 (1)
- RE: The -90 dB argument and the "H" word. - Jaundiced Ear 18:49:05 04/8/15 (0)