|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here in lies the problem posted by Sprezza Tura on February 1, 2015 at 07:16:48:
"The EMI remasters were done at 96/24 because the remastering team said their was an enormous amount of tape restoration required, and that 96/24 offered the best solution."
The EMI team just needed more and/or faster computers. I've done a fair amount of digital restoration and at the faster sampling rates there is more waiting involved with a slow computer, an annoyance that I would not have experienced with a faster computer. If management cared enough to do the job right they would have paid for adequate tools and/or paid for the engineers while they are having coffee and waiting for a batch to finish processing.
EMI is a big company. They know how to manipulate the press. You can be sure that the engineers or other spokesmen were told what to say. Perhaps a different story will come out years later when some of the people involve retire and their jobs are no longer on the line.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here in lies the problem - Tony Lauck 02/1/1507:35:19 02/1/15 (4)
- RE: Here in lies the problem - Sprezza Tura 07:52:21 02/1/15 (3)
- RE: Here in lies the problem - Tony Lauck 08:12:57 02/1/15 (2)
- RE: Here in lies the problem - Sprezza Tura 08:23:09 02/1/15 (1)
- RE: Here in lies the problem - Tony Lauck 08:40:34 02/1/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
