RE: "subject is simply following it's logical course" - sure it does. Just not in the way you misrepresent it. - Tony Lauck

Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - JPlay now blocked by JRiver - Mercman 07:24:51 12/4/14 (36)

Jplay can now be unblocked with new plugin.. - agattu 18:52:19 12/4/14 (1)

Just like fmak guessed. That was fast. N/T - carcass93 19:41:19 12/4/14 (0)

I am very surprised - Jon L 18:01:38 12/4/14 (1)

RE: I am very surprised - Bob_C 19:04:49 12/4/14 (0)

A recent thread on computeraudiophile.com, - Beetlemania 12:18:32 12/4/14 (4)

RE: A recent thread on computeraudiophile.com, - Tony Lauck 10:59:04 12/5/14 (3)

The newly-banned OP of the thread - Beetlemania 12:17:32 12/5/14 (2)

RE: The newly-banned OP of the thread - Antoine 13:53:49 12/5/14 (1)

"JRiver is known to not respond to any 'normal style' communications if the tone is critical." - Beetlemania 14:07:58 12/5/14 (0)

RE: JPlay now blocked by JRiver - fmak 08:38:21 12/4/14 (0)

RE: JPlay now blocked by JRiver - rick_m 08:34:38 12/4/14 (3)

I think the support argument is red herring - Dave_K 16:55:33 12/4/14 (1)

RE: I think the support argument is red herring - Bob_C 18:06:42 12/4/14 (0)

Fully agree with 2nd sentence. But, AFAIK, JRiver support is through their web forum. - carcass93 09:14:28 12/4/14 (0)

Going back in non re-written history - JeffH 08:03:54 12/4/14 (19)

"subject is simply following it's logical course" - sure it does. Just not in the way you misrepresent it. - carcass93 09:10:23 12/4/14 (4)

Then tell me how it went down - JeffH 12:35:11 12/4/14 (2)

Sure, why not. - carcass93 13:01:38 12/4/14 (1)

RE: Sure, why not. - Bob_C 14:28:44 12/4/14 (0)

RE: "subject is simply following it's logical course" - sure it does. Just not in the way you misrepresent it. - Tony Lauck 12/4/1409:52:10 12/4/14 (0)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Mercman 08:07:03 12/4/14 (13)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Bob_C 19:28:18 12/4/14 (1)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Mercman 02:49:06 12/5/14 (0)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Beetlemania 10:54:36 12/4/14 (10)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Mercman 12:28:19 12/4/14 (9)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - fmak 01:34:24 12/5/14 (6)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Mercman 03:07:32 12/5/14 (5)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - fmak 03:58:20 12/5/14 (4)

RE: Going back in non re-written history - Tony Lauck 10:57:17 12/5/14 (3)

But Jim Hillegas might find that price worthwhile - Beetlemania 12:21:36 12/5/14 (2)

RE: But Jim Hillegas might find that price worthwhile - Tony Lauck 12:43:40 12/5/14 (1)

RE: But Jim Hillegas might find that price worthwhile - Beetlemania 13:06:49 12/5/14 (0)

Thanks for the reply - Beetlemania 12:37:29 12/4/14 (1)

RE: Thanks for the reply - Mercman 12:49:25 12/4/14 (0)

question - Joe Murphy Jr 07:27:45 12/4/14 (1)

No (nt) - Mercman 07:40:35 12/4/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: "subject is simply following it's logical course" - sure it does. Just not in the way you misrepresent it. - Tony Lauck 12/4/1409:52:10 12/4/14 (0)

RE: "subject is simply following it's logical course" - sure it does. Just not in the way you misrepresent it.

Post a Message!