In Reply to: RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources posted by Thorsten on October 18, 2014 at 11:45:32:
"Anyway, Tony I am pretty sure based on other posts by you that you do know these niceties, but I felt it important to append them to your post."
You are correct.
"This is a subject to give rise to major engineering challenges in single boxes merely to mandated limits of RFI/EMI, having more than one box interconnected makes it into a bit of a nightmare, even if you get to design all the boxes yourself."
One would think that vendors selling "high end" components would have addressed these issues. That they do not, is an indication that the "high end" marketplace lacks knowledgeable customers.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Tony Lauck 10/18/1413:51:07 10/18/14 (34)
- But you would never know, - so why guess? - Sordidman 09:38:32 10/20/14 (30)
- RE: But you would never know, - so why guess? - Bob_C 23:21:50 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: But you would never know, - so why guess? - Tony Lauck 10:09:28 10/20/14 (28)
- Because some transports sound better than others - Sordidman 11:45:21 10/20/14 (27)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Tony Lauck 12:12:52 10/20/14 (17)
- your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sordidman 14:44:51 10/20/14 (16)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Tony Lauck 17:45:37 10/20/14 (15)
- Nope: less read errors due to less disc wobble -t - Sordidman 20:11:02 10/20/14 (11)
- RE: Nope: less read errors due to less disc wobble -t - Tony Lauck 20:50:03 10/20/14 (10)
- Nope: still errors, & less with VRDS wi live playback - Sordidman 21:39:16 10/20/14 (9)
- RE: Nope: still errors, & less with VRDS wi live playback - Tony Lauck 07:29:35 10/21/14 (8)
- You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sordidman 10:00:01 10/21/14 (7)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 12:10:29 10/23/14 (5)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 12:56:26 10/23/14 (4)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 14:58:59 10/23/14 (3)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 17:10:17 10/23/14 (2)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 19:41:00 10/23/14 (1)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 07:49:12 10/24/14 (0)
- I feel sorry for TL - fmak 05:58:24 10/23/14 (0)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sprezza Tura 18:05:18 10/20/14 (2)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Tony Lauck 18:53:49 10/20/14 (1)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sprezza Tura 19:28:15 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 12:07:01 10/20/14 (8)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sordidman 15:05:57 10/20/14 (7)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 15:47:11 10/20/14 (6)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Tony Lauck 19:06:48 10/20/14 (5)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 19:25:57 10/20/14 (4)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Bob_C 23:30:56 10/20/14 (3)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 07:30:41 10/21/14 (2)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Bob_C 08:49:28 10/21/14 (1)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 09:01:32 10/21/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - rick_m 09:15:12 10/19/14 (2)
- I agree - fmak 23:18:50 10/19/14 (1)
- As you have so rightly, and repeatedly, pointed out - Sordidman 09:46:52 10/20/14 (0)