In Reply to: Sure he was clear - and totally wrong, in assumption that containing it is all that's needed. posted by carcass93 on September 22, 2014 at 08:39:58:
"and totally wrong, in assumption that containing it is all that's needed."
Please explain why you believe that Thorsten was totally wrong.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sure he was clear - and totally wrong, in assumption that containing it is all that's needed. - Tony Lauck 09/22/1408:50:51 09/22/14 (10)
- See my question to you about Spread Spectrum below. - carcass93 09:00:35 09/22/14 (9)
- "Resolution" a typical audiophile ploy - Tony Lauck 10:23:48 09/22/14 (5)
- So many assumptions in your post - Sordidman 15:34:01 09/22/14 (2)
- RE: So many assumptions in your post - Tony Lauck 18:05:53 09/22/14 (1)
- We are all so fortunate - Sordidman 22:13:34 09/22/14 (0)
- Besides being "a typical audiophile ploy", resolution is also a qualitative attribute. - carcass93 11:27:58 09/22/14 (1)
- RE: Besides being "a typical audiophile ploy", resolution is also a qualitative attribute. - Tony Lauck 18:24:20 09/22/14 (0)
- RE: See my question to you about Spread Spectrum below. - Thorsten 10:03:37 09/22/14 (2)
- I do not doubt your AUDIO system's resolution - and am commenting strictly on computer part. - carcass93 10:10:27 09/22/14 (1)
- I would not expect the system downstream from it to be truly resolving - fmak 12:06:53 09/22/14 (0)