In Reply to: RE: 50 ft ethernet vs. wireless posted by Charlie8521 on September 2, 2014 at 06:26:20:
" I'm questioning if I'm loosing some sound quality by using the Wireless approach."
If you are using lossy compressed streams that come over the Internet or any music downloaded from the iTunes store the original encoding of the music is already poor. Unless you are getting obvious dropouts or glitches due to poor wireless reception there is no point in worrying about sound quality. With MP3, AAC, etc., the concept of sound quality is simply inoperative.
If you are streaming high quality material from a server on your local network then there might be an issue, depending on your equipment and its set up, particularly the location of all the wireless devices with respect to your audio components. Just having a wireless base station near audio equipment even if it's being used by other family members to surf the web may possibly degrade sound. (And if it is close to your body some suggest it may degrade your health.) The worst potential for sonic degradation comes when an audio component itself is running with wireless enabled. From looking at Linux process statistics, It's obvious that the wireless software can place a high load (more than what is required to play audio) on the processor. Cheap wireless adapters have very little actual hardware, delegating most functions to software on their host device.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sound Quality is an inoperative concept with most Internet streams - Tony Lauck 09/2/1407:28:55 09/2/14 (0)