In Reply to: Behringer DEQ2496 posted by fmak on February 16, 2013 at 08:55:06:
"How can you draw any valid conclusion using the cheapest of cheap (yes, I own 2) and lowest quality of low component in a replay chain?
And it doesn't matter how you mod the Behringer; it's just a budeget component that cannot be improved beyong a certain low point in terms of audio reproduction.."
Huh??!! I'm using the Behringer as digital EQ. I measured the TosLink degradation to show you what happened to the jitter. Essentially what I did here was to naturalistically inject 2ns of jitter into my Transporter; was able to measure it, and heard no issues. What does "cheapness" (price?) have anything to do with this?
It's not like I'm using the Behringer as a DAC. Please provide a rationale for your comments because I do not see your point...
-------
Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What does "cheapness" have anything to do with this? RE: Behringer DEQ2496 - Archimago 02/16/1309:14:55 02/16/13 (7)
- Crap in hi fidelity terms - fmak 10:21:47 02/16/13 (6)
- Sigh... RE: Crap in hi fidelity terms - Archimago 11:08:01 02/16/13 (5)
- RE: Sigh... RE: Crap in hi fidelity terms - beppe61 12:25:51 02/16/13 (4)
- TosLink, jitter and reality testing... - Archimago 14:31:26 02/17/13 (1)
- RE: TosLink, jitter and reality testing... - beppe61 09:16:15 02/18/13 (0)
- Why Toshlink can sound 'fine' - fmak 21:54:16 02/16/13 (1)
- RE: Why Toshlink can sound 'fine' - beppe61 01:02:17 02/17/13 (0)