In Reply to: RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! posted by Tony Lauck on January 18, 2013 at 09:36:21:
Thanks Tony.
Hmmm... Not sure if that roll-off is natural. Plus I'm not too keen in keeping a file with such strong signal up at 50+kHz which is all noise. For my music server, I would gladly downsample the file to 24/88 and save the audio system from try to amplify all that.
-------
Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Archimago 01/18/1309:58:02 01/18/13 (11)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Tony Lauck 10:40:55 01/18/13 (10)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Sprezza Tura 13:29:52 01/18/13 (9)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Tony Lauck 14:14:44 01/18/13 (2)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Sprezza Tura 18:00:36 01/18/13 (1)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Tony Lauck 18:09:41 01/18/13 (0)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Archimago 14:06:32 01/18/13 (5)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Tony Lauck 18:05:25 01/18/13 (3)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Sprezza Tura 18:06:51 01/18/13 (2)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Tony Lauck 18:12:42 01/18/13 (1)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Sprezza Tura 18:25:04 01/18/13 (0)
- RE: But the original SONY/Columbia SACD looks like a CD upconversion! - Sprezza Tura 18:05:20 01/18/13 (0)