Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - File comparison test between bitdepts and samplerates. Did anyone ever did such a test? - hfavandepas 09:51:53 12/7/12 (37)

• RE: File comparison test between bitdepts and samplerates. Did anyone ever did such a test? - telackey 15:06:17 12/7/12 (0)
• RE: File comparison test between bitdepts and samplerates. Did anyone ever did such a test? - Tony Lauck 11:20:06 12/7/12 (14)
• The question was intended more like a survey. - hfavandepas 12:34:03 12/7/12 (13)
• RE: The question was intended more like a survey. - Tony Lauck 12:54:50 12/7/12 (12)
• And audiophiles can be ripped off very, very easy. :-) (nt) - hfavandepas 13:13:18 12/7/12 (11)
• Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Dynobot 13:20:42 12/7/12 (10)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Tony Lauck 13:27:04 12/7/12 (9)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Mercman 13:36:25 12/7/12 (6)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - fmak 07:15:23 12/8/12 (5)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Tony Lauck 08:11:58 12/8/12 (4)
• It's difficult - fmak 08:47:44 12/8/12 (3)
• RE: It's difficult - Tony Lauck 08:54:51 12/8/12 (2)
• Mercman had no problem - fmak 10:59:32 12/8/12 (1)
• RE: Mercman had no problem - Bob_C 06:11:09 12/9/12 (0)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Dynobot 13:32:35 12/7/12 (1)
• RE: Getting ripped off vs. Having money to burn depends on perspective:-) (nt) - Bob_C 06:17:59 12/9/12 (0)
• RE: File comparison test between bitdepts and samplerates. Did anyone ever did such a test? - Presto 10:59:53 12/7/12 (2)
• Why bother? - fmak 07:13:35 12/8/12 (0)
• RE: File comparison test between bitdepts and samplerates. Did anyone ever did such a test? - Tony Lauck 12:24:07 12/7/12 (0)
• I did this years ago - see here... No/little difference IMO. - Archimago 10:11:36 12/7/12 (17)
• RE: I did this years ago - see here... No/little difference IMO. - hfavandepas 11:28:36 12/7/12 (16)
• Hey Mark I have anecdotal data from listening - theob 12:30:22 12/7/12 (15)
• RE: Hey Mark I have anecdotal data from listening - hfavandepas 13:01:55 12/7/12 (4)
• RE: Hey Mark I have anecdotal data from listening - theob 14:09:50 12/7/12 (2)
• How is the quality of your rmains power? - hfavandepas 02:27:10 12/8/12 (1)
• RE: How is the quality of your rmains power? - theob 02:57:30 12/8/12 (0)
• RE: Hey Mark I have anecdotal data from listening - Tony Lauck 13:55:19 12/7/12 (0)
• RE: Hey Mark I have anecdotal data from listening - Archimago 12:40:19 12/7/12 (9)
• With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - hfavandepas 13:26:45 12/7/12 (8)
• It's a blog alright - fmak 08:49:52 12/8/12 (2)
• "Just a rambling". What label should your posts here on the PC-audioasylum get? - hfavandepas 11:02:42 12/8/12 (1)
• RE: "Just a rambling". What label should your posts here on the PC-audioasylum get? - fmak 21:49:26 12/8/12 (0)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Tony Lauck 13:45:07 12/7/12 (4)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Archimago 12/8/1213:04:54 12/8/12 (3)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Tony Lauck 14:00:45 12/8/12 (2)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Archimago 19:24:34 12/9/12 (1)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Tony Lauck 06:21:40 12/10/12 (0)

Follow Ups

• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Archimago 12/8/1213:04:54 12/8/12 (3)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Tony Lauck 14:00:45 12/8/12 (2)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Archimago 19:24:34 12/9/12 (1)
• RE: With 24-bits, no way any current technology can reach this - Tony Lauck 06:21:40 12/10/12 (0)