In Reply to: RE: Rating of transports posted by Bob_C on November 10, 2012 at 08:21:33:
Absolutely agree with Bob.
Seems meaningless without the context and comments of the methodology involved... Moreover, this individual obviously holds certain controversial ideas as truths - many of which argued here countless times.
Fmak, care to include a link (from the article?) to this quote?
-------
Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Rating of transports - Archimago 11/12/1209:39:27 11/12/12 (16)
- An Advertisement for Services in Disguise - AbeCollins 08:47:35 11/13/12 (3)
- RE: An Advertisement for Services in Disguise - ItemAudio 08:32:01 11/20/12 (0)
- your ride has been piumped - Old Listener 13:15:43 11/13/12 (1)
- And a good discussion on Fusion Drive - AbeCollins 08:10:05 11/15/12 (0)
- RE: Rating of transports - Roseval 10:30:36 11/12/12 (11)
- RE: Rating of transports - Archimago 09:14:38 11/13/12 (10)
- RE: Rating of transports - ItemAudio 08:21:15 11/20/12 (0)
- I agree with Abe. This "ranking" is clearly for advertisement - fmak 07:08:07 11/20/12 (7)
- RE: I agree with Abe. This "ranking" is clearly for advertisement - ItemAudio 08:12:18 11/20/12 (6)
- RE: I agree with Abe. This "ranking" is clearly for advertisement - Tony Lauck 11:09:45 11/20/12 (5)
- Relocker - fmak 02:21:55 11/21/12 (3)
- RE: Relocker - Tony Lauck 06:16:54 11/21/12 (0)
- RE: Relocker - ItemAudio 04:08:09 11/21/12 (1)
- One clock - Tony Lauck 06:05:01 11/21/12 (0)
- RE: I agree with Abe. This "ranking" is clearly for advertisement - ItemAudio 15:07:13 11/20/12 (0)
- another over exaggerated conclusion..... - Sordidman 09:42:33 11/14/12 (0)