Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. posted by jmall on March 6, 2012 at 15:11:01:
How did you 'blind test' this with your wife?
-------
Archimago's Musings: A 'more objective' audiophile blog.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Jon L 14:05:01 03/6/12 (82)
- Sure, Just download Paul Simon's "So Beautiful or So What" - JerryS 08:46:36 03/11/12 (1)
- RE: Sure, Just download Paul Simon's "So Beautiful or So What" - AbeCollins 12:26:14 03/11/12 (0)
- The big "Yabbut" here... - Presto 13:09:30 03/8/12 (4)
- 2L hires test bench - Tony Lauck 15:54:01 03/8/12 (3)
- Here are some more test files - drystream 06:59:55 03/9/12 (1)
- Great test files, thanks! - Tony Lauck 20:09:04 03/9/12 (0)
- Thanks Tony! I'll be sure to try those! (nt) - Presto 16:06:27 03/8/12 (0)
- I'm sure glad "Monty" has an opinion. - carcass93 06:46:27 03/8/12 (4)
- RE: I'm sure glad "Monty" has an opinion. - phofman 07:29:13 03/8/12 (3)
- Thanks, I like it very much, too. - carcass93 08:46:37 03/8/12 (2)
- RE: Thanks, I like it very much, too. - phofman 11:31:38 03/8/12 (0)
- But - fmak 11:27:39 03/8/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - b.l.zeebub 02:24:16 03/7/12 (7)
- Or you can skip his nonsense, together with his mediocre products, in its entirety. N/T - carcass93 06:36:09 03/8/12 (2)
- RE: Or you can skip his nonsense, together with his mediocre products, in its entirety. N/T - Presto 13:13:20 03/8/12 (1)
- RE: Or you can skip his nonsense, together with his mediocre products, in its entirety. N/T - Tony Lauck 15:19:12 03/8/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Tony Lauck 13:35:37 03/7/12 (3)
- I read no contradictions. Both articles are complimentary IMHO. - hfavandepas 03:24:05 11/1/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - fmak 11:29:48 03/8/12 (1)
- Link to two excellent dCS white papers - Tony Lauck 12:56:21 03/8/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - antigrunge 01:58:57 03/7/12 (0)
- It's a pathetic attempt to baffle people with Bullshit. nt - Tony Lauck 17:29:16 03/6/12 (31)
- And yet, there are limits... - Scrith 11:04:37 03/7/12 (29)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...the limit is analog - Dynobot 14:25:54 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - fmak 11:45:07 03/7/12 (27)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Werner 22:39:34 03/8/12 (18)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - fmak 22:48:07 03/8/12 (17)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Werner 04:48:53 03/9/12 (16)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - fmak 10:29:05 03/9/12 (2)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Werner 23:51:55 03/9/12 (1)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - fmak 07:49:53 03/10/12 (0)
- Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Tony Lauck 07:54:20 03/9/12 (12)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Werner 00:07:06 03/10/12 (2)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Tony Lauck 07:42:07 03/10/12 (0)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Ryelands 02:34:54 03/10/12 (0)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - fmak 22:28:27 03/9/12 (2)
- Loudness Compensation - Tony Lauck 06:31:22 03/10/12 (1)
- RE: Loudness Compensation - fmak 09:04:16 03/10/12 (0)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - audioNeil 09:36:59 03/9/12 (4)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Tony Lauck 11:56:29 03/9/12 (3)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - fmak 22:25:53 03/9/12 (2)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - Tony Lauck 06:22:35 03/10/12 (1)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - fmak 07:54:11 03/10/12 (0)
- RE: Concept of "bandwidth" in non-linear systems: ill-defined. - rick_m 09:23:14 03/9/12 (0)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Bob_C 15:15:47 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - mls-stl 14:21:48 03/7/12 (6)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Tony Lauck 15:08:55 03/7/12 (5)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - mls-stl 15:58:42 03/7/12 (4)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - Tony Lauck 15:48:18 03/8/12 (1)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - mls-stl 19:22:00 03/8/12 (0)
- RE: And yet, there are limits...Put it this way - fmak 21:48:10 03/7/12 (1)
- Curious... - mls-stl 01:16:56 03/8/12 (0)
- RE: It's a pathetic attempt to baffle people with Bullshit. nt - fmak 22:06:15 03/6/12 (0)
- Misinformation - audioengr 17:12:04 03/6/12 (21)
- RE: Misinformation - Presto 12:48:44 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: Misinformation - Werner 02:40:09 03/7/12 (3)
- RE: Misinformation - audioengr 11:20:07 03/7/12 (2)
- RE: Misinformation - Werner 11:28:35 03/7/12 (1)
- Depends on the slope - fmak 11:48:03 03/7/12 (0)
- What is good enough? - Archimago 22:11:25 03/6/12 (15)
- "Need" is not to be confused with "Want". - Tony Lauck 12:59:30 03/7/12 (3)
- I agree... But... RE: "Need" is not to be confused with "Want". - Archimago 21:28:22 03/7/12 (2)
- RE: I agree... But... RE: "Need" is not to be confused with "Want". - Adriel 21:45:35 03/8/12 (1)
- Disagree... - Archimago 17:33:23 03/9/12 (0)
- RE: What is good enough? - audioengr 11:21:57 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: What is good enough? - lokie 05:09:28 03/7/12 (1)
- RE: What is good enough? - b.l.zeebub 11:40:57 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: What is good enough? - Adriel 22:22:54 03/6/12 (7)
- RE: What is good enough? - b.l.zeebub 02:27:30 03/7/12 (4)
- RE: What is good enough? - Tony Lauck 13:16:50 03/7/12 (2)
- RE: What is good enough? - b.l.zeebub 14:40:06 03/7/12 (1)
- RE: What is good enough? - Tony Lauck 14:57:55 03/7/12 (0)
- I agree (nt) - audioengr 11:23:17 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: What is good enough? - Archimago 22:24:21 03/6/12 (1)
- RE: What is good enough? - Adriel 22:08:27 03/7/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - jmall 15:11:01 03/6/12 (3)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Archimago 03/6/1221:26:27 03/6/12 (2)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - jmall 10:53:13 03/9/12 (1)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Archimago 18:02:21 03/9/12 (0)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Crimson 14:16:27 03/6/12 (2)
- Right - audioengr 17:13:37 03/6/12 (1)
- RE: Right, That's funny! - audioAl 12:53:57 11/1/12 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Archimago 03/6/1221:26:27 03/6/12 (2)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - jmall 10:53:13 03/9/12 (1)
- RE: Article: 24/192kHz quality worse than 16/44.1. - Archimago 18:02:21 03/9/12 (0)