In Reply to: The Op. 77 portion, yes. nt posted by David Smith on September 14, 2015 at 10:36:27:
I analyzed the 96/24 HDtracks download of movement 1 starting at 17:43. Specifically, I looked at the actual waveform starting at 17:43.3 and counted out 100 cycles of the note. Starting and ending at a well defined zero crossing of each cycle, the 100 cycles took 21596 samples at 96000 Hz. This gives a pitch of 444.53. There was very little variation in the cycle time, so I believe this is pretty accurate. It also corresponds to what a 65K FFT spectrum (Blackman window) shows. I double checked my counting and took the sample counts out of Soundforge.
You can download a short clip of this note.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 444.53 Hz. - Tony Lauck 09/14/1512:54:03 09/14/15 (10)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - David Smith 13:08:00 09/14/15 (9)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - Tony Lauck 17:49:56 09/14/15 (8)
- Comparison of two speeds - Tony Lauck 19:57:10 09/14/15 (2)
- RE: Comparison of two speeds - David Smith 20:09:30 09/14/15 (1)
- RE: Comparison of two speeds - Tony Lauck 20:29:07 09/14/15 (0)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - David Smith 18:24:59 09/14/15 (4)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - Tony Lauck 18:44:10 09/14/15 (3)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - David Smith 19:59:38 09/14/15 (2)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - Tony Lauck 20:15:35 09/14/15 (1)
- RE: 444.53 Hz. - David Smith 20:22:01 09/14/15 (0)