In Reply to: RE: Perhaps you missed the obvious posted by Davey on May 24, 2014 at 09:26:03:
The capacitance is not significant IF the driving source is not affected by it.
the logical fallacy known as circular reasoning . :)
but I don't agree this configuration invalidates the entire testing scheme
Then what is the point of comparing two inputs where the electrical characteristics have been forced to be exactly the same? Why would anyone think that results would be anything but the same?
Do you believe 74, 510 and 626 represent the same value?
Sorry if you're missing the humor. I fell out of my chair laughing when I first read the test methodology. :^)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yours is a great example of... - E-Stat 05/24/1409:40:06 05/24/14 (18)
- RE: Yours is a great example of... - Davey 10:15:02 05/24/14 (17)
- "That scheme is a little tricky to get your head wrapped around" - E-Stat 10:38:59 05/24/14 (16)
- RE: "That scheme is a little tricky to get your head wrapped around" - Davey 11:14:30 05/24/14 (15)
- What exactly - E-Stat 13:41:12 05/24/14 (14)
- A Coke and Pepsi analogy. Classic! :) - Davey 21:58:12 05/24/14 (0)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 21:04:22 05/24/14 (12)
- We have a winner! - E-Stat 06:28:23 05/25/14 (0)
- RE: What exactly - Davey 21:56:08 05/24/14 (10)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 23:55:31 05/24/14 (9)
- RE: What exactly - Davey 05:04:16 05/25/14 (7)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 13:41:14 05/25/14 (6)
- RE: What exactly - Davey 15:15:37 05/25/14 (5)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 16:40:12 05/25/14 (4)
- RE: What exactly - Davey 17:58:56 05/25/14 (3)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 21:21:27 05/25/14 (2)
- RE: What exactly - Davey 05:56:24 05/26/14 (1)
- RE: What exactly - Utley1 07:12:31 05/26/14 (0)
- RE: What exactly - Satie 01:47:49 05/25/14 (0)