General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here is the original AES paper posted by John Atkinson on January 20, 2016 at 04:02:59:
This booklet makes the case for why intellectual property is bad.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - MQA questions - tubby2 12:53:44 01/16/16 (101)
- What happened to perfect sound forever? - vinyl survivor 17:59:16 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: What happened to perfect sound forever? - ahendler 18:39:33 01/17/16 (2)
- It was "awfully perfect sound forever" but "awfully" was thought redundant - tubby2 18:53:04 01/17/16 (1)
- Ouch! Very ouch! Nt - geoffkait 09:23:51 01/18/16 (0)
- The only thing that matters to me... - genungo 10:38:22 01/17/16 (1)
- Presumably... - E-Stat 16:16:40 01/17/16 (0)
- Here is the original AES paper - meisterkleef 08:24:46 01/17/16 (20)
- " It is essentially a lossy (perceptual coding) downsampling/upsampling process." - E-Stat 16:04:13 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - tubby2 13:40:36 01/17/16 (18)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 05:23:45 01/18/16 (17)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - tubby2 09:46:11 01/18/16 (16)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 11:33:19 01/18/16 (15)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - tubby2 16:35:42 01/18/16 (13)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - cpmavrick 06:33:39 01/19/16 (12)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - tubby2 08:12:25 01/19/16 (1)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - cpmavrick 09:40:55 01/19/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 07:30:14 01/19/16 (9)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 11:52:18 01/19/16 (8)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 04:02:59 01/20/16 (6)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 01/20/1610:33:32 01/20/16 (5)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 11:02:12 01/20/16 (4)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - meisterkleef 11:39:32 01/20/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 11:30:40 01/20/16 (2)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 12:26:04 01/20/16 (1)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 12:52:41 01/20/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:05:07 01/19/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - tubby2 12:42:31 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 16:41:01 01/16/16 (39)
- RE: " MQA is not Meridian, MQA is a separate company." - Ivan303 12:21:14 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: " MQA is not Meridian, MQA is a separate company." - Michael Lavorgna 12:23:31 01/17/16 (1)
- RE: "Again, so what? " - Ivan303 12:38:15 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - tubby2 10:19:05 01/17/16 (22)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 11:46:49 01/17/16 (16)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 11:58:28 01/17/16 (15)
- RE: "Calling me a shill, is not fine." -- Where? (nt) - goldenthal 14:58:47 01/17/16 (1)
- Down below here... - genungo 05:20:14 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 12:16:28 01/17/16 (12)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 12:21:01 01/17/16 (11)
- RE: MQA questions, opening quotation -- Again, where? (nt) - goldenthal 15:01:14 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 12:42:53 01/17/16 (9)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 12:51:25 01/17/16 (8)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:28:10 01/17/16 (7)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 13:37:36 01/17/16 (6)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:49:15 01/17/16 (5)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 14:31:36 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 13:48:30 01/18/16 (0)
- MQA is NOT a hoax... - Ivan303 14:53:17 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: MQA is NOT a hoax... - ahendler 15:15:20 01/17/16 (1)
- I have no idea... - Ivan303 16:46:07 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 10:45:25 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:34:23 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 13:52:06 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 13:48:28 01/17/16 (1)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 15:18:42 01/17/16 (0)
- Not Optimistic...... - Todd Krieger 00:22:04 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: Not Optimistic...... - Michael Lavorgna 08:46:55 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: "No advanced record/playback technology will get off the ground..." - genungo 02:50:37 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 17:08:23 01/16/16 (9)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 17:12:07 01/16/16 (8)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 17:14:12 01/16/16 (7)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 17:17:10 01/16/16 (6)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 21:21:43 01/16/16 (5)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 08:50:18 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 11:18:54 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 11:22:13 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: MQA questions - E-Stat 16:06:51 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions -- Oh, I see now. Still, an overreaction? (nt) - goldenthal 15:12:08 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 15:58:34 01/16/16 (8)
- Agreed. nt - jusbe 22:54:30 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Todd Krieger 01:16:20 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 12:35:25 01/17/16 (2)
- Sounds like - jusbe 22:59:09 01/17/16 (1)
- A 21st century Dynagroove. - Tony Lauck 13:55:38 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - tubby2 17:10:01 01/16/16 (2)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 17:15:25 01/16/16 (1)
- RE: MQA questions - tubby2 14:14:26 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - double28 14:55:06 01/16/16 (22)
- RE: MQA questions - tubby2 15:10:14 01/16/16 (21)
- You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - John Marks 15:21:36 01/16/16 (20)
- RE: You might have better luck . . . Whence all the thin skins? (nt) - goldenthal 15:20:13 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Tony Lauck 12:06:50 01/17/16 (16)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Michael Lavorgna 12:12:45 01/17/16 (15)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - goldenthal 15:31:01 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Tony Lauck 12:24:07 01/17/16 (13)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Michael Lavorgna 12:27:34 01/17/16 (12)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - goldenthal 15:36:11 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Tony Lauck 12:58:08 01/17/16 (10)
- RE: fraud: I Guess I Withdraw My Thanks (nt) - goldenthal 15:37:57 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Michael Lavorgna 13:00:55 01/17/16 (8)
- RE: You . . . fraud. With Respect, Oathhelping. (nt) - goldenthal 15:41:38 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Tony Lauck 13:08:20 01/17/16 (6)
- Why on earth do we need yet another DAC format? - E-Stat 15:58:50 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: . . . fraud.: Some As-yet-unwarranted Assumption Here (nt) - goldenthal 15:44:20 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - Michael Lavorgna 13:11:47 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: You . . . .Unfounded Smearing Here (nt) - goldenthal 15:47:21 01/17/16 (2)
- Get the feeling you are being ignored? - Ivan303 16:35:39 01/17/16 (1)
- RE: Get the feeling you are being ignored? - goldenthal 16:42:04 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: You might have better luck if you didn't accuse people of fraud. - tubby2 15:32:31 01/16/16 (1)
- Decent of you to do so. So I will stand down. - John Marks 20:05:32 01/16/16 (0)
- Have a nice day. - John Marks 14:37:54 01/16/16 (1)
- RE: Have a nice day. And Let's All Put Pants Back on. (nt) - goldenthal 15:49:32 01/17/16 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 01/20/1610:33:32 01/20/16 (5)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 11:02:12 01/20/16 (4)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - meisterkleef 11:39:32 01/20/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 11:30:40 01/20/16 (2)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 12:26:04 01/20/16 (1)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 12:52:41 01/20/16 (0)