In Reply to: RE: MQA questions posted by Michael Lavorgna on January 17, 2016 at 12:21:01:
All of these people are in the business of trying to sell me stuff. I have no reason to believe they are independent. They all stand to benefit if a new format can be foisted off on the audio marketplace.
If Stewart were truly interested in furthering the art of audio, he would simply release a specification and open source code for MQA, just as was done with FLAC. Then, and only then, would I believe that his primary goal was to improve the state of the art and not the state of his bank account. I don't hold it against him that he doesn't do it, but conclude that he's just another smart engineer out to try to make a buck by disrupting the industry.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 01/17/1612:42:53 01/17/16 (9)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 12:51:25 01/17/16 (8)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:28:10 01/17/16 (7)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 13:37:36 01/17/16 (6)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:49:15 01/17/16 (5)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 14:31:36 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 13:48:30 01/18/16 (0)
- MQA is NOT a hoax... - Ivan303 14:53:17 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: MQA is NOT a hoax... - ahendler 15:15:20 01/17/16 (1)
- I have no idea... - Ivan303 16:46:07 01/17/16 (0)