In Reply to: RE: No way posted by May Belt on October 21, 2013 at 07:26:26:
"audiophiles have NOT led the way in cryogenic treatments. In fact, many in audio have shown reluctance in adopting such techniques - in the face of some 25 years of various people reporting using that technique and gaining improvements in the sound."
It was almost 25 years ago that George Tice stunned the audiophile community with his Radio Shack clock. To date "audiophiles" haven't exactly adopted his clock as a necessary improvement in their audio systems. It is a question of efficacy: if there was a real improvement there would be a clock in every listening room. It is the same with cryogenic treatment.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: No way that it makes a profound difference - Palustris 10/21/1311:52:23 10/21/13 (5)
- I think part of it is no wway to know if the change will be GOOD, or for the worse. - Elizabeth 19:36:21 10/21/13 (1)
- No guts, no glory. - geoffkait 11:09:17 10/22/13 (0)
- Profound difference... - mkuller 18:52:33 10/21/13 (1)
- RE: Profound difference... - Ozzie 19:21:37 10/21/13 (0)
- RE: No way that it makes a profound difference - geoffkait 13:14:40 10/21/13 (0)