Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Cryogenic Tempering of Wire - Beatnik 12:50:44 02/8/01 (57)

• Re: Cryogenic Tempering of Wire - orejones 07:17:08 02/10/01 (1)
• Plastics bounce back - John Marks 10:05:02 02/10/01 (0)
• Fine musical instrument makers use it! (nt) - clarkjohnsen 14:56:08 02/9/01 (2)
• not on copper! (nt) - micah 18:30:47 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: As do the finest of audiophiles! (nt) - alan m. kafton 17:47:24 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Cryogenic Tempering of Wire - micah 10:07:16 02/9/01 (0)
• Gold looks golden because... - John Marks 10:07:09 02/9/01 (0)
• Yes and Maybe - John Marks 18:34:21 02/8/01 (1)
• Re: Yes and Maybe - Charles E 21:37:36 02/8/01 (0)
• Among the many things we don't understand . . . - Rick Gardner 17:38:59 02/8/01 (0)
• Re: Cryogenic Tempering of Wire - Jecopo 15:42:40 02/8/01 (0)
• As a physicist, - Aurel 13:14:46 02/8/01 (45)
• As a Pipe fitter welder - R B 21:17:48 02/8/01 (0)
• Re: As a physicist, - john curl 15:46:48 02/8/01 (43)
• Dear John Curl, - Aurel 08:12:10 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: As a physicist, - Adi 15:59:07 02/8/01 (41)
• Re: As a physicist, - Brian Walsh 16:50:33 02/8/01 (40)
• Re: As a physicist, - Sean 23:36:47 02/8/01 (39)
• Re: As a physicist, - john curl 02:43:34 02/9/01 (38)
• You are way too much arrogant ! - Aurel 02/9/0108:18:14 02/9/01 (31)
• Re: You are way too much arrogant ! - john curl 21:00:43 02/10/01 (1)
• 100% agree with this ! (nt) - Aurel 07:48:31 02/11/01 (0)
• Re: NASA Cryogenics at: http://irtek.arc.nasa.gov/CryoDev.html (nt) - geoffkait 08:32:13 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: You are way too much arrogant ! - geoffkait 08:25:41 02/9/01 (25)
• Of course ! - Aurel 08:31:18 02/9/01 (24)
• Re: Of course ! - geoffkait 08:51:36 02/9/01 (23)
• Surely not. That's rude to say the least - jj 16:16:49 02/9/01 (6)
• Re: Surely not. That's rude to say the least - geoffkait 16:57:07 02/9/01 (5)
• Re: Surely not. That's rude to say the least - john curl 21:07:42 02/10/01 (0)
• And how does your asking for such a link involve finding the truth? - jj 19:00:32 02/9/01 (3)
• Re: And how does your asking for such a link involve finding the truth? - geoffkait 21:36:03 02/9/01 (2)
• It depends on what you treat, of course - jj 01:59:29 02/10/01 (1)
• Re: It depends on what you treat, of course - geoffkait 08:20:18 02/10/01 (0)
• Re: Of course ! - Aurel 09:42:35 02/9/01 (14)
• Non baryonic particles - jj 16:21:26 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Bolometers - Bruce from DC 10:44:20 02/9/01 (11)
• Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - Pam 12:43:50 02/9/01 (8)
• Re: Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - geoffkait 13:34:06 02/9/01 (1)
• Re: Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - Aurel 13:45:10 02/9/01 (0)
• Very impressive ! - Aurel 13:04:29 02/9/01 (5)
• Re: Very impressive ! - Pam 16:05:44 02/9/01 (4)
• Re: Very impressive ! - john curl 17:43:08 02/9/01 (3)
• Without going into brandnames... - jj 02:03:07 02/10/01 (0)
• Re: you flirt, you! - Pam 18:13:59 02/9/01 (1)
• Re: you flirt, you! - john curl 17:45:22 02/10/01 (0)
• Huh, namedropper,,,(nt) - R B 11:15:15 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Bolometers - Aurel 10:57:03 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Of course ! - geoffkait 10:25:49 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Cryogenic Society of America - geoffkait 09:22:47 02/9/01 (0)
• Will you - R B 08:25:06 02/9/01 (1)
• LOL ! - Aurel 08:29:18 02/9/01 (0)
• As a Pipe fitter welder - R B 08:16:56 02/9/01 (2)
• Re: As a Pipe fitter welder - john curl 14:21:20 02/9/01 (1)
• Absorption & reflection as we learn in photography. - R B 23:32:23 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: As a physicist, - Sean 02:48:50 02/9/01 (2)
• Re: As a physicist, - john curl 02:53:48 02/9/01 (1)
• Re: As a physicist, - john curl 02:57:44 02/9/01 (0)

Follow Ups

• You are way too much arrogant ! - Aurel 02/9/0108:18:14 02/9/01 (31)
• Re: You are way too much arrogant ! - john curl 21:00:43 02/10/01 (1)
• 100% agree with this ! (nt) - Aurel 07:48:31 02/11/01 (0)
• Re: NASA Cryogenics at: http://irtek.arc.nasa.gov/CryoDev.html (nt) - geoffkait 08:32:13 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: You are way too much arrogant ! - geoffkait 08:25:41 02/9/01 (25)
• Of course ! - Aurel 08:31:18 02/9/01 (24)
• Re: Of course ! - geoffkait 08:51:36 02/9/01 (23)
• Surely not. That's rude to say the least - jj 16:16:49 02/9/01 (6)
• Re: Surely not. That's rude to say the least - geoffkait 16:57:07 02/9/01 (5)
• Re: Surely not. That's rude to say the least - john curl 21:07:42 02/10/01 (0)
• And how does your asking for such a link involve finding the truth? - jj 19:00:32 02/9/01 (3)
• Re: And how does your asking for such a link involve finding the truth? - geoffkait 21:36:03 02/9/01 (2)
• It depends on what you treat, of course - jj 01:59:29 02/10/01 (1)
• Re: It depends on what you treat, of course - geoffkait 08:20:18 02/10/01 (0)
• Re: Of course ! - Aurel 09:42:35 02/9/01 (14)
• Non baryonic particles - jj 16:21:26 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Bolometers - Bruce from DC 10:44:20 02/9/01 (11)
• Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - Pam 12:43:50 02/9/01 (8)
• Re: Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - geoffkait 13:34:06 02/9/01 (1)
• Re: Gee we ougth to have a cosmology & science asylum - Aurel 13:45:10 02/9/01 (0)
• Very impressive ! - Aurel 13:04:29 02/9/01 (5)
• Re: Very impressive ! - Pam 16:05:44 02/9/01 (4)
• Re: Very impressive ! - john curl 17:43:08 02/9/01 (3)
• Without going into brandnames... - jj 02:03:07 02/10/01 (0)
• Re: you flirt, you! - Pam 18:13:59 02/9/01 (1)
• Re: you flirt, you! - john curl 17:45:22 02/10/01 (0)
• Huh, namedropper,,,(nt) - R B 11:15:15 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Bolometers - Aurel 10:57:03 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Of course ! - geoffkait 10:25:49 02/9/01 (0)
• Re: Cryogenic Society of America - geoffkait 09:22:47 02/9/01 (0)
• Will you - R B 08:25:06 02/9/01 (1)
• LOL ! - Aurel 08:29:18 02/9/01 (0)