|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: AFAIK, they're referring to Clark's amlifier challenge posted by josh358 on February 11, 2011 at 08:59:38:
of including unproven assumptions in the *test". Naturally, he required that both amplifiers be connected to a common ABX box. So what's wrong with that? Isn't the impedance of the switches low enough to prevent any issues? Surely such a simple box will have zero effect on the outcome. Right? Not according to Frank Van Alstine. Oops . And for those who say that you can simply switch both sides to eliminate the problem, then there's this . So let's compare the shared signal of both to the shared signal of both. Hear any differences?
While not intended, you find all sorts of ways that researchers dumb down tests (E Brad's Hi Rez test anyone?) and then blindly follow the results of the contrived tests.
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's another great example - E-Stat 02/11/1113:53:27 02/11/11 (3)
- Those high res tests were a joke - josh358 09:13:43 02/12/11 (2)
- ABX tests can be useful in some cases - E-Stat 09:35:23 02/12/11 (1)
- RE: ABX tests can be useful in some cases - josh358 17:27:51 02/12/11 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
