While having so many unanswered queries/doubts in cryogenic cable after reading a post below, I searched and found a site (see the link) which gives some insight about the science of the Deep Cryogenic Treatment (DCT). From the attached pictures of the OFC samples of cable and ic, it seems the boundaries of the molecules or microstructures of the metal are narrower after the treatment. It definitely benefits the movement of signal IMO. The testimonials column of the site also reflected positive reviews from two hifi mags and from users on DCT. However, the first Q&A from the FAQ column of the site does point out that certain cables & materials are not suitable for DCT (unfortunately no details are given). The full Q&A are as follows:Q. Is it true that any audio cable; interconnect, speaker cable, mains cable etc. be deep cryogenically treated (DCT)?
A. No, There are certain cables & materials that Frozen Solid Audio have deemed unsuitable for DCT. We are aware that there are certain companies that will tell you otherwise. Most of these companies are relatively new to the field and are desperate for your business. But once they have your money, will they still be around or be able to explain why your cables covering is starting to split, or why you exotic RCA/XLR connector is starting to break up? That is why Frozen Solid Audio will never treat an audio component that we know could or will fail prematurely.
Any thoughts especially from inmates who have compared the normal cables (pc, ic, speaker cable) with the cryo’ed ones?
Thanks.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - Kyu 21:27:21 10/30/04 (26)
- What's all the fuss about? (long) - craiggoff 18:24:13 11/2/04 (3)
- Re: What's all the fuss about? (long) - CryoParts 06:48:44 11/3/04 (1)
- Re: bats and bulbs - geoffkait 07:46:59 11/3/04 (0)
- Very interesting read! Thanks for sharing. (nt) - Kyu 22:59:45 11/2/04 (0)
- Re: My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - poweristheanswer 03:32:56 11/2/04 (1)
- Curious if you witnessed this being done; - cdb 21:35:16 11/1/04 (1)
- Well, actually.... - blake 05:18:00 11/2/04 (0)
- Re: My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - geoffkait 06:19:55 11/1/04 (0)
- Re: My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - Mudcat 05:23:31 11/1/04 (0)
- Re: My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - Mudcat 07:24:40 10/31/04 (9)
- Mudcat, can you ask your colleagues take a look of the "link" and see what they say? Thanks. (nt) - Kyu 20:20:11 10/31/04 (7)
- I looked at the front page. - jneutron 07:48:32 11/1/04 (2)
- Re: I looked at the front page. - Kyu 19:26:14 11/1/04 (1)
- Re: I looked at the front page. - jneutron 07:16:46 11/2/04 (0)
- Re: Mudcat, can you ask your colleagues take a look of the "link" and see what they say? Thanks. (nt) - Psychicanimal 20:37:13 10/31/04 (3)
- Re: Mudcat, can you ask your colleagues take a look of the "link" and see what they say? Thanks. (nt) - Mudcat 03:45:26 11/1/04 (1)
- Re: Mudcat, can you ask your colleagues take a look of the "link" and see what they say? Thanks. (nt) - Psychicanimal 05:38:12 11/1/04 (0)
- Definitely I will listen! - Kyu 20:48:05 10/31/04 (0)
- I can hear differences in cryo treatment from different labs in the same model power cord. - Psychicanimal 07:47:22 10/31/04 (0)
- Re: My search on "Deep Cryogenic Treatment" - StevenACNJ 03:48:06 10/31/04 (0)
- Deep Cryogenic Treatment WORKS! - Carlos 22:36:04 10/30/04 (4)
- Re: Deep Cryogenic Treatment WORKS! - blake 04:44:27 10/31/04 (3)
- Re: Deep Cryogenic Treatment WORKS! - Mudcat 04:55:33 11/1/04 (2)
- Re: Deep Cryogenic Treatment WORKS! - blake 07:50:00 11/1/04 (1)
- Re: Deep Cryogenic Treatment WORKS! - Mudcat 03:52:08 11/2/04 (0)