Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Mike B.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - beeker 09:51:46 06/3/02 (49)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Ray Kimber 13:52:06 06/5/02 (4)

Will will be evaluating Cryo tubes - Response Audio 08:44:26 06/6/02 (2)

Re: Will will be evaluating Cryo tubes - john curl 11:04:43 06/6/02 (1)

Re: Will will be evaluating Cryo tubes - Response Audio 15:26:42 06/6/02 (0)

No harm done - Gregory Bartlett 21:49:52 06/5/02 (0)

It's all about the process, not the audible benefits. - R. Hertz 07:47:16 06/4/02 (15)

Re: It's all about the process, not the audible benefits. - Gregory Bartlett 23:38:35 06/4/02 (4)

Re: It's all about the process, not the audible benefits. - R. Hertz 07:35:20 06/5/02 (3)

Cryogenic application in music production/reproduction - Some Guy 08:58:40 06/5/02 (2)

Re: Dear Mr. Some...... - alan m. kafton 13:12:15 06/5/02 (0)

Re: Cryogenic application in music production/reproduction - micah 12:18:45 06/5/02 (0)

Re: - geoffkait 09:16:12 06/4/02 (9)

Depends - R. Hertz 12:03:20 06/4/02 (0)

Re: - alan m. kafton 11:35:46 06/4/02 (7)

You are correct. - R. Hertz 12:05:55 06/4/02 (6)

Re: Just the facts, Jack. - alan m. kafton 14:38:35 06/4/02 (5)

Railroad tracks and "facts" - waVeman 14:17:57 06/7/02 (0)

One problem: - R. Hertz 16:25:17 06/4/02 (3)

Re: One problem: - alan m. kafton 21:30:29 06/4/02 (2)

So we're back to the original point. - R. Hertz 07:40:25 06/5/02 (1)

Re: The original point... - geoffkait 09:43:17 06/5/02 (0)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Fatbosco 18:09:16 06/3/02 (4)

Cryonics not Cryogenics - Gregory Bartlett 22:22:04 06/4/02 (3)

Re: Cryonics not Cryogenics - Some Guy 09:03:39 06/5/02 (2)

Re: Stiffness - geoffkait 11:32:58 06/5/02 (1)

Re: Stiffness - Some Guy 12:33:20 06/5/02 (0)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - OceanRoar 13:13:33 06/3/02 (13)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Gregory Bartlett 22:19:53 06/4/02 (1)

Re: Very nice site, Gregory. [nt] - alan m. kafton 03:23:43 06/5/02 (0)

Not immersion - audioengr 13:34:15 06/3/02 (10)

Re: Not immersion - john curl 17:18:55 06/5/02 (2)

Re: So, John...... - alan m. kafton 17:38:55 06/5/02 (1)

Re: So, John...... - john curl 17:47:45 06/5/02 (0)

Re: Not immersion - Mike B. 14:03:45 06/3/02 (6)

This is the right way - audioengr 14:12:41 06/3/02 (5)

Re: This is the right way - Tekunda 15:02:20 06/3/02 (4)

Website - audioengr 10:07:40 06/4/02 (0)

Re: Cryopro - geoffkait 15:21:16 06/3/02 (2)

Cryopro: Inferior or superior or the same? - Tekunda 16:26:29 06/3/02 (1)

Re: Cryopro: Inferior or superior or the same? - geoffkait 17:22:49 06/3/02 (0)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - micah 12:34:39 06/3/02 (2)

Regarding the cryotweaks illustration - beeker 06:42:08 06/4/02 (1)

Re: Regarding the cryotweaks illustration - micah 13:39:23 06/4/02 (0)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Mike B. 06/3/0209:56:52 06/3/02 (5)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - john curl 17:15:07 06/5/02 (0)

Here is the link - Brian Walsh 15:36:00 06/3/02 (3)

Listening Comparison - Magnetar 06:30:29 06/5/02 (2)

Re: Listening Comparison - Brian Walsh 15:21:52 06/5/02 (1)

Thanks <nt> - Magnetar 05:20:22 06/6/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - Mike B. 06/3/0209:56:52 06/3/02 (5)

Re: Cryogenics, where is the supporting evidence? - john curl 17:15:07 06/5/02 (0)

Here is the link - Brian Walsh 15:36:00 06/3/02 (3)

Listening Comparison - Magnetar 06:30:29 06/5/02 (2)

Re: Listening Comparison - Brian Walsh 15:21:52 06/5/02 (1)

Thanks <nt> - Magnetar 05:20:22 06/6/02 (0)