Re: But, Alan...

Posted by alan m. kafton (M) on January 20, 2002 at 11:47:42

In Reply to: Re: But, Alan... posted by geoffkait on January 20, 2002 at 09:57:39:

"The cables themselves could be viewed as not "generating sound" as you say, but generating/carrying signal, so why not condition the conditioner?"

Well, imho, the *only* tweak that *might* make the Cooker circuitry even more efficient would be cryogenic treatment of some/all of the discrete components on the PCB, and/or perhaps the PCB itself. That might make for a hot-rodded Cooker indeed!! The circuit(s) are already incredibly efficient, if you were able to see things on a scope.

"I wonder if anyone has compared effectiveness of MOBIE with Cable Cooker, or tried one them in sequence over a period of time"

Yes....this has been done, and independently of me. But I'll stay clear of this one as I don't wan't to be accused of shameless commercial promotion. I'm not interested in doing battle with the Audio Police again, nor with the armchair "designers/engineers" who've *never* used my product in the first place.

"... maybe they are affecting the cables differently?"

Yes they are.

alan m. kafton

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Just when does "Burn in" meet "Burn out"...and vice versa? - Bosh 23:51:15 01/19/02 (19)

I think.... - Joe S 18:53:22 01/20/02 (4)

Go to dictionary. Look up "irony". Re-read original post. Reply with smiley-face icon. - Bosh 22:23:36 01/20/02 (0)

Go to dictionary. Look up "irony". Re-read original post. Reply with smily-face icon. - Bosh 22:22:36 01/20/02 (2)

You probably meant to... - geoffkait 04:59:05 01/21/02 (0)

Re: And while you're at it, find two ways to spell "smiley"... - Bosh 22:26:43 01/20/02 (0)

take a deep breath and relax..... - late 02:51:24 01/20/02 (13)

:-) But I'm still left wondering who burns in the burn-in device. - Bosh 08:39:59 01/20/02 (4)

Re: :-) But I'm still left wondering who burns in the burn-in device. - geoffkait 08:47:31 01/20/02 (3)

Re: Actually, Geoff...... - alan m. kafton 09:12:40 01/20/02 (2)

Re: But, Alan... - geoffkait 09:57:39 01/20/02 (1)

Re: But, Alan... - alan m. kafton 01/20/0211:47:42 01/20/02 (0)

Re: take a deep breath and relax..... - rcrump 06:03:58 01/20/02 (7)

Re: Dear Bob...... - alan m. kafton 09:30:20 01/20/02 (6)

"Yawn" as I have seen somebody say as - rcrump 15:34:17 01/20/02 (5)

Re: The "unsubstantiated" claims...... - alan m. kafton 23:50:55 01/20/02 (4)

Alan... - Brian Walsh 22:10:15 01/21/02 (2)

Re: Goodnight, Gracie. [nt]. - alan m. kafton 00:40:28 01/22/02 (1)

Was that the - Brian Walsh 17:15:06 01/22/02 (0)

Re: The "unsubstantiated" claims...... - rcrump 06:36:35 01/21/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: But, Alan... - alan m. kafton 01/20/0211:47:42 01/20/02 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.