In Reply to: RE: Only if you don't understand physics :-) posted by Dawnrazor on September 3, 2010 at 11:26:32:
Dawnrazor,
Let me tell you a little bit about the testing that I have been conducting over the last few years:
The one-shot trial and error substitutions that are the current basis of the audiophile doctrine are replaced by predictable, systematic, repeatable, scalable and defeatable operations.
The power of convolution processors, linear-phase filters, sampled reverbs and spatial matrix’ing is much more compelling and efficient than power-cord, speaker-cable, interconnect, cleaning solution, fuses, isolation/coupling devices, tonearm, cartridge or even source component swapping.
A simple way to test this approach for free is to listen to two different mastered versions of the same recording or to an original version compared to a re-mastered edition. Even XRCD's and K2HD CD's are products of re-mastering and see how much difference the process makes as compared to cable or fuse swapping, for instance.
I will post updated pictures of my systems (plural) to show you my test equipment.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Only if you don't understand physics :-) - carlos269 09/3/1012:50:19 09/3/10 (1)
- RE: Only if you don't understand physics :-) - Dawnrazor 18:41:47 09/3/10 (0)