General Asylum: A modest proposal by abc

General Asylum: A modest proposal by abc

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

FAQ / News / Events

A modest proposal

206.230.237.94

In Reply to: Re: Is it the norm for a bi-amp system to have a crossover.............. posted by Steve on June 5, 1999 at 21:04:37:

Let us adopt the phrase 'duo-amping' to distinguish bi-amp(using a frequency dividing network ahead of the amps)from the practice of using two amps with their inputs wyed together driving the speaker crossover sections.The phrase 'vertical bi-amping' has low popularity and is too similar.All it will take is a little concerted effort to eliminate the confusion.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Topic - Is it the norm for a bi-amp system to have a crossover.............. - Eric U. 20:00:59 06/5/99 ( 12)

Passive or Active, that is the question .................. - Sean 10:07:46 06/6/99 ( 7)
- I'm begining work on Triamped/active filter,stay tuned! - Tazsmonn 11:50:22 06/6/99 ( 2)
  - Are there any active crossovers "NEW" on the market? - Tazsmonn 12:07:44 06/6/99 ( 1)
    - Re: Are there any active crossovers "NEW" on the market? - Phil Sieg 13:57:43 06/6/99 ( 0)
- Re: Passive or Active, that is the question .................. - Eric U. 10:48:18 06/6/99 ( 3)
  - Re: Passive or Active, that is the question .................. - Phil Sieg 14:01:23 06/6/99 ( 2)
    - There's not variable input, but thanks. (nt) - Tazsmonn 15:32:29 06/6/99 ( 1)
      - Re: There's not variable input, but thanks. (nt) - Phil Sieg 15:37:30 06/6/99 ( 0)
Re: Is it the norm for a bi-amp system to have a crossover.............. - Phil Sieg 07:12:39 06/6/99 ( 0)
Re: Is it the norm for a bi-amp system to have a crossover.............. - Steve 21:04:37 06/5/99 ( 2)
- A modest proposal - abc 06/5/99 23:31:21 06/5/99 ( 1)
  - Re: A modest proposal - Steve 21:12:20 06/6/99 ( 0)