|
Speaker Asylum: Keep believing what? by E-Stat General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
For Sale Ads |
206.255.203.68
In Reply to: Keep believing that E-Stat. p posted by Ozzie on February 2, 2007 at 11:12:22:
That they work as advertised for nearly thirty years?Total cubic feet of displacement? Ah, not quite.
To what are you referring?
By design a planer rolls off starting at 40 Hz. Any planer.
That's planar . The larger Maggies, Apogees, and a few full range stats run into the high twenties.
...either you have either added a sub or someone is fudging their data.
I don't know why it is you find it hard to believe that planars do what they do. Maggies have been around for quite some time.
We all know that the Rad Shack meter rolls off below 50 Hz or so. You undoubtedly fudged as you saw fit it to get your numbers the way you want them too.
Thats what correction curves are for. The actual calibrated variance at 20 hz is 2.5 db.
10 degrees off axis, I seriously doubt it. Remember, rolled off highs sound subjectively better.
How little you understand how the Sound Labs panel is arranged. Unlike KLH Nines, Quads, Acoustats, Martin-Logans, Audiostatics, Staxes, etc., the diaphragm is held by a faceted frame that covers a ninety degree arc (they do make some 22 degree and 45 degree models designed for creating multiple speaker arrays). Looking from above the speaker presents a half cylinder. The panels in my Acoustats, however, were flat as a board as was the frame. There wasn't the slightest bit of curve to it. And yes, off axis happened quite quickly. Not so with the U-1s.
rw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 02:58:16 02/1/07 ( 74)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - morricab 06:15:26 02/2/07 ( 3)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:33:51 02/2/07 ( 2)
- I think you're the ultimate troll - suits_me 19:57:24 02/3/07 ( 0)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - morricab 14:46:13 02/3/07 ( 0)
Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - hahax@verizon.net 20:28:07 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:37:20 02/2/07 ( 0)
You almost havie it backwords... - RGA 17:42:49 02/1/07 ( 36)
- Strongly disagree. - jsm 11:44:56 02/2/07 ( 4)
- Re: Strongly disagree. - RGA 18:42:15 02/2/07 ( 3)
- Ah, but a smooth frequency response does not guarantee good classical music performance. - jsm 12:33:13 02/5/07 ( 0)
- Re: Strongly disagree. - morricab 14:49:15 02/3/07 ( 1)
- Re: Strongly disagree. - DRCope 10:46:55 02/5/07 ( 0)
Re: You almost havie it backwords... - JimL 19:58:22 02/1/07 ( 30)
- Re: You almost havie it backwords... - RGA 03:00:32 02/2/07 ( 23)
- You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 07:32:00 02/2/07 ( 22)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 18:44:15 02/2/07 ( 6)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 05:34:46 02/3/07 ( 5)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 05:55:25 02/3/07 ( 4)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 07:15:47 02/3/07 ( 3)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 08:17:48 02/3/07 ( 2)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - Pat D 09:14:42 02/3/07 ( 1)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 17:18:26 02/3/07 ( 0)
- Re: You have to have some understanding of the measurements . . . - RGA 18:37:58 02/2/07 ( 0)
- Interestingly . . . - markrohr 14:36:34 02/2/07 ( 2)
- Re: Interestingly . . . - Pat D 18:07:38 02/2/07 ( 1)
- Re: Interestingly . . . - morricab 14:53:57 02/3/07 ( 0)
Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - beppe61 10:54:01 02/2/07 ( 10)
- Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - Pat D 17:55:31 02/2/07 ( 9)
- Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - RGA 19:14:08 02/2/07 ( 8)
- Re: Thank you very much Sir for the very interesting links. - morricab 14:56:21 02/3/07 ( 0)
- Errrr . . . - Pat D 06:02:26 02/3/07 ( 6)
- Re: Errrr . . . - RGA 08:44:43 02/3/07 ( 5)
- Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 10:17:20 02/3/07 ( 4)
- Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - RGA 17:41:31 02/3/07 ( 3)
- Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 19:04:00 02/3/07 ( 2)
- Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - RGA 19:55:47 02/3/07 ( 1)
- Re: Yeah, yeah, we know you don't like Canadian speakers, Harman International speakers, etc. - Pat D 04:22:14 02/4/07 ( 0)
Re: You almost havie it backwords... - longtimequadowner 23:50:26 02/1/07 ( 5)
- The EQ illustrates my point. - RGA 03:33:25 02/2/07 ( 1)
- Re: The EQ illustrates my point. - beppe61 10:59:07 02/2/07 ( 0)
" Take a look at a square wave passed through a quad - it's square! " - beppe61 00:13:14 02/2/07 ( 2)
- Actually - longtimequadowner 01:03:30 02/2/07 ( 1)
- Re: Actually - beppe61 10:46:26 02/2/07 ( 0)
Well, some people swear this speaker sounds great. - The Real Dick Hertz 16:53:11 02/1/07 ( 3)
- Nevertheless distortion is very low ... could this be instead .. - beppe61 11:09:12 02/2/07 ( 0)
Re: Well, some people swear this speaker sounds great. - beppe61 11:02:22 02/2/07 ( 0)
Wow!! - Jayme 17:21:08 02/1/07 ( 0)
Flat response is only the beginning. - richardl 15:37:31 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: Flat response is only the beginning. - beppe61 11:12:03 02/2/07 ( 0)
This may help you - Schu 14:47:41 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: This may help you - beppe61 10:35:15 02/2/07 ( 0)
A flat frequency response will never sound good -- it's not a goal - Richard BassNut Greene 08:54:53 02/1/07 ( 2)
- Why not tilted down ever so slightly? - Ozzie 10:57:17 02/2/07 ( 1)
Re: A flat frequency response will never sound good -- it's not a goal - beppe61 11:14:46 02/1/07 ( 0)
One drive unit playing in uniform manner from 60-18kHz is a tall order - Gregm 08:45:20 02/1/07 ( 7)
- And achievable with electrostats :) - E-Stat 16:38:12 02/1/07 ( 5)
- Keep believing that E-Stat. p - Ozzie 11:12:22 02/2/07 ( 4)
- Keep believing what? - E-Stat 02/2/07 19:46:49 02/2/07 ( 3)
- Re: Keep believing what? - Ozzie 10:24:07 02/5/07 ( 2)
- You're kidding, right? - E-Stat 12:25:25 02/5/07 ( 1)
- Yo - Ozzie, we've had this discussion before - E-Stat 15:14:47 02/5/07 ( 0)
Re: One drive unit playing in uniform manner from 60-18kHz is a tall order - beppe61 10:48:52 02/1/07 ( 0)
Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 05:42:52 02/1/07 ( 7)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 07:24:00 02/1/07 ( 6)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 08:31:42 02/1/07 ( 3)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:54:42 02/1/07 ( 2)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - Schu 11:02:00 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 13:30:11 02/1/07 ( 0)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - STUART 08:25:19 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: Please excuse my trivial question on speakers design. - beppe61 10:59:24 02/1/07 ( 0)
Suppose... - RobertG 05:20:37 02/1/07 ( 3)
- Re: Suppose... - beppe61 07:39:24 02/1/07 ( 2)
- So you said "low distortion". - sser2 11:51:31 02/1/07 ( 1)
- Re: So you said "low distortion". - beppe61 13:36:30 02/1/07 ( 0)