|
Computer Audio Asylum: Testing between WAV and FLAC by John Swenson Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
For Sale Ads |
147.145.40.44
In Reply to: Lossless should sound a lot bettern than uncompressed posted by Scrith on May 29, 2007 at 13:00:02:
I've done quite a few comparisons between WAV and FLAC in different system configurations.
And yes I CAN hear a difference under some circumstances and not in others.
In my current setup using a squeezbox I can definately hear a difference between streaming wav or flac (flac sounds worse) but I cannot hear a difference between wav or flac stored on the server. In all cases there are no bit errors, I have played a DTS recording stored originally as a wav file under all these situations and sent the digital out from the SB to a DTS decoder and I get the proper music out of it. If I do anything which I know changes bits (digital domain volume control, resampling etc) all I get is noise outof the decoder. This is a pretty good indication that whatever is causing the sonic differences is not bit changes.
With a USB DAC connected to a computer I can tell the difference between wav and flac under some situations. With short cables or the Optics USB cable I cannot tell the difference, but with long passive cables I can hear a difference. Checking bit accuracy is not so easy in this case. My guess is that the noise/jitter due to the long cable is getting to the point where it is significant to sonics, and changes in playback runtime (processing, disk seeks whatever) are causing a change in that noise/jitter which becomes audible. On the short or Optics cable the runtime differences are small enough they are not audible without the extra noise/jitter from the cable.
So I think its pretty well determined that from a bit perspective they are identical, but that under some circumstances in some systems there is an audible difference durring playback.
What I don't think we know yet is what the actual mechanisms are for those differences, there are a lot of hypothesis floating around, but testing them is going to be very tough. Especially when they are not audible in all cases.
I don't have any MACs so I have not done any tests with MAC formats. I know people that HAVE heard differences in MAC formats, but I did not take part in those tests.
John S.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Formats be Damned - dtz 12:27:34 05/28/07 ( 30)
- RE: Formats be Damned - GCrouser@hvc.rr.com 14:49:24 05/29/07 ( 1)
- single wav/cue - SeVeReD 00:41:48 06/2/07 ( 0)
My Humble Opinion - JimOfOakCreek 05:37:41 05/29/07 ( 0)
RE: Formats be Damned - xmasparty@mac.com 20:24:19 05/28/07 ( 0)
I don't use iTunes, but - J.Mac 15:10:49 05/28/07 ( 0)
RE: Formats be Damned - Robert Joe 13:32:39 05/28/07 ( 0)
RE: Formats be Damned - Nieustevea@msn.com 13:27:18 05/28/07 ( 3)
- RE: Formats be Damned - maabx 05:46:36 05/29/07 ( 1)
- RE: Formats be Damned - J.Mac 13:04:58 05/29/07 ( 0)
Most commonly, AIFF is not compressed - J.Mac 15:04:24 05/28/07 ( 0)
RE: Formats be Damned - J.Mac 13:26:04 05/28/07 ( 19)
- Well said - kgiessler 15:37:24 05/28/07 ( 18)
- RE: Well said - rick_m 21:35:33 05/28/07 ( 0)
- But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - rick_m 16:45:20 05/28/07 ( 16)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - maabx 05:50:38 05/29/07 ( 5)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - Dawnrazor 06:44:09 05/29/07 ( 4)
- Lossless should sound a lot bettern than uncompressed - Scrith 13:00:02 05/29/07 ( 2)
- Testing between WAV and FLAC - John Swenson 05/30/07 15:26:46 05/30/07 ( 1)
- RE: Testing between WAV and FLAC - Scrith 14:34:57 06/1/07 ( 0)
- RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - maabx 07:09:53 05/29/07 ( 0)
RE: But that doesn't mean they always sound as good... - kgiessler 17:53:29 05/28/07 ( 9)
- Precisely.. - rick_m 20:22:10 05/28/07 ( 8)
- RE: Precisely.. - kgiessler 20:34:56 05/28/07 ( 7)
- RE: Precisely.. - JimOfOakCreek 08:38:02 05/29/07 ( 6)
- RE: Precisely.. - Dawnrazor 08:16:55 05/31/07 ( 5)
- Take the LAME recommendations with a grain of salt. - rick_m 22:38:29 05/31/07 ( 4)
- RE: LAME 320.... - alan m. kafton 02:42:43 06/1/07 ( 3)
- RE: LAME 320 sounds awfully good. - rick_m 08:56:40 06/1/07 ( 2)
- FYI - to eliminate sw issues, the tracks were copied onto CDR... - danny kaey 10:02:11 06/1/07 ( 1)
- Even then software issues lurk. - rick_m 10:45:22 06/1/07 ( 0)