|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum: Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid by EGeddes Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
For Sale Ads |
69.209.183.247
In Reply to: Best 6.5†95 dB mid posted by rick57@optusnet.com.au on May 7, 2006 at 05:05:29:
First, contrary to other posters I applaud your ratioanl and scientific approach to this. Just buy them and listen is a bit too uncontrolled for me. You may as well role dice.I may have misled you however in that I recently switched to the B&C 6NDL38, the Neo model with a flux ring. This driver truely is well controlled. Its a little less sensitive than the 6MD38, and more expensive, but my calculations say that its MAX_SPL would only be about 3 dB lower which is not a big issue. I don't care too much about sensitivity (I don't use tubes) but I do care about MAX_SPL because in a home theater thats a big issue. At about 113 dB SPL max the 6NDL38 suites the task. I may add a tweeter to it and I may not. I am not convinced that HF from a surround channel are important. In fact a rolled off high end gives the subjective impression of the sound being father away. In a small HT this is exactly what I want.
I also meant to make another point. I don't hold a lot of credance to the axial response. If its real bad then its hard to see how the speaker could be any good, but being real flat does not mean that the speaker has good directional control or having some small axial aberations does not mean that the polar response is not excellent. You see the axial response is a rather unique place to make measurements - its equal distance from all points on the driver. But more importantly in a power response calculation it is the least significant point. Thats because in the power response the points are weighted by sin(theta), which is zero for the axial position. One does not actually use a value of zero, but in the power calculation the axial point has the lowest weighting of any of the points.
I will never make a judgement about a driver until I see its polar response. Then I can tell how well controlled and designed it is and how well its likely to work in a system.
Axial response is way too over emphasized.
Earl Geddes
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Best 6.5†95 dB mid - rick57@optusnet.com.au 05:05:29 05/7/06 ( 22)
- Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - el`Ol 11:20:23 05/9/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - EGeddes 05/7/06 11:17:48 05/7/06 ( 10)
- B&C 6NDL38 - rick57@optusnet.com.au 20:31:51 05/7/06 ( 1)
- Re: B&C 6NDL38 - EGeddes 06:36:33 05/8/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - -baffle size(s) for measuring polar? - freddyi 13:26:33 05/7/06 ( 2)
- Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - -baffle size(s) for measuring polar? - EGeddes 16:52:59 05/7/06 ( 1)
- Re:baffle size(s) for measuring polar? thanks Earl (nt) - freddyi 16:27:44 05/8/06 ( 0)
polar response and cone profile - Duke 13:18:30 05/7/06 ( 1)
- Re: polar response and cone profile - EGeddes 14:05:56 05/7/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - David Allan Coe 11:46:53 05/7/06 ( 2)
- Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - EGeddes 12:55:06 05/7/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - EGeddes 12:46:15 05/7/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - DHT 4 ME 08:02:24 05/7/06 ( 8)
- PHL 1120 - rick57@optusnet.com.au 03:38:24 05/8/06 ( 7)
- Re: PHL 1120 - DHT 4 ME 05:48:42 05/8/06 ( 6)
- treatment of the dustcap is essential on either - rick57@optusnet.com.au 20:27:55 05/8/06 ( 1)
- Re: treatment of the dustcap is essential on either - DHT 4 ME 07:04:50 05/9/06 ( 0)
- PHLs - rick57@optusnet.com.au 20:27:01 05/8/06 ( 1)
- Re: PHLs - DHT 4 ME 07:08:11 05/9/06 ( 0)
- Re: PHL 1120 - Ochoa 15:16:10 05/8/06 ( 1)
- Re: PHL 1120 - DHT 4 ME 16:54:11 05/8/06 ( 0)
Re: Best 6.5†95 dB mid - David Allan Coe 05:56:50 05/7/06 ( 0)