|
Hi-Rez Highway: RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] by Ted Smith New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
For Sale Ads |
71.112.95.63
In Reply to: RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] posted by MGH on September 17, 2007 at 09:37:14:
Howdy
There are plenty of articles in the JAES, etc. about jitter ( http://www.google.com/search?q=+site:www.aes.org+jitter .) I've already pointed out the measurability of jitter and listed a few articles in Stereophile etc. Also just swap a few digital interconnects in your system to hear jitter differences (and if you don't be happy.) I personally don't care about peer reviewed articles on such subjects, I know the people involved all too well :)
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Interesting take on the Nova Memeory Player vs. NWO-2.5T From APL website - Duilawyer 20:44:44 09/10/07 ( 71)
- Once more a thread focusing on what you hear versus what might merit hearing a difference - Norm 07:52:16 09/20/07 ( 0)
Don't understand why people diss a product without even hearing it. - MGH 19:30:51 09/13/07 ( 30)
- RE: Don't understand why people diss a product without even hearing it. - Alex Peychev 02:17:08 09/14/07 ( 29)
- RE: Don't understand why people diss a product without even hearing it. - MGH 16:04:33 09/14/07 ( 28)
- I am sorry...... - Alex Peychev 19:12:07 09/14/07 ( 27)
- RE: I am sorry...... - MGH 03:14:04 09/16/07 ( 21)
- That is incorrect, in blind testing, people do hear the difference - Sordidman 12:49:17 09/17/07 ( 4)
- RE: That is incorrect, in blind testing, people do hear the difference - MGH 17:59:13 09/17/07 ( 3)
- Right? Criticize the tests when you don't get the results you want.. - Sordidman 16:35:39 09/20/07 ( 0)
- Good points here - Robert C. Lang 20:13:40 09/18/07 ( 1)
- RE: Good points here - MGH 21:56:22 09/18/07 ( 0)
- RE: I am sorry...... - Charles Hansen 08:40:51 09/16/07 ( 15)
- RE: I am sorry...... - MGH 22:09:17 09/16/07 ( 2)
- RE: I am sorry...... - Charles Hansen 09:00:37 09/17/07 ( 1)
- RE: I am sorry...... - MGH 09:27:02 09/17/07 ( 0)
- That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - Ted Smith 08:56:23 09/16/07 ( 11)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - MGH 22:21:00 09/16/07 ( 10)
- No, just real world experience, perhaps your should give it a go? - Sordidman 12:52:14 09/17/07 ( 2)
- RE: No, just real world experience, perhaps your should give it a go? - MGH 15:55:13 09/18/07 ( 1)
- Ha! But you're the one making all of the assumptions - Sordidman 16:26:50 09/20/07 ( 0)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - Alex Peychev 10:52:24 09/17/07 ( 3)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - MGH 12:39:52 09/17/07 ( 2)
- Why spend thousands when it all is just inside our own "psychoacoustic" minds? -t - Sordidman 12:53:39 09/17/07 ( 1)
- RE: Why spend thousands when it all is just inside our own "psychoacoustic" minds? -t - MGH 17:46:23 09/17/07 ( 0)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - Ted Smith 23:16:50 09/16/07 ( 2)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - MGH 09:37:14 09/17/07 ( 1)
- RE: That's much more politic than what I was starting to write :) [nt] - Ted Smith 09/17/07 10:03:31 09/17/07 ( 0)
RE: the "rabbit hole" is much deeper than even I thought. - Charles Hansen 19:38:16 09/14/07 ( 4)
- RE: That is why ... - Dr. S 10:42:45 09/17/07 ( 3)
- Most excellent post -t - Sordidman 12:56:35 09/17/07 ( 0)
- RE: That is why ... - Gerry E. 11:00:56 09/17/07 ( 1)
- RE: Two Maine Coons here, as well - Dr. S 13:52:56 09/17/07 ( 0)
This wets my appetite even more to hear the MP at the RMAF. nt - Norm 06:20:28 09/12/07 ( 0)
RE: Interesting take on the Nova Memeory Player vs. NWO-2.5T From APL website - Semper Fidelity 18:39:40 09/11/07 ( 2)
- Not only that... - David W. Robinson 23:14:16 09/13/07 ( 0)
RE: Interesting take on the Nova Memeory Player vs. NWO-2.5T From APL website - Charles Hansen 18:42:01 09/11/07 ( 0)
i think it's far more interesting... - some young guy 14:54:04 09/11/07 ( 0)
"Made with computer/cheap parts" is not a valid argument - SoftwireEngineer 14:17:14 09/11/07 ( 1)
- RE: "Made with computer/cheap parts" is not a valid argument - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:50:41 09/14/07 ( 0)
Interesting stuff below by Charles.... - Sordidman 11:45:47 09/11/07 ( 3)
- RE: Interesting stuff below by Charles.... - bjh 21:46:23 09/13/07 ( 2)
- Interesting... - Sordidman 12:12:55 09/14/07 ( 1)
- RE: Interesting... - bjh 14:26:34 09/14/07 ( 0)
RE: Interesting take on the Nova Memeory Player vs. NWO-2.5T From APL website - ontrack2@gmail.com 22:08:33 09/10/07 ( 26)
- RE: Interesting take on the Nova Memeory Player vs. NWO-2.5T From APL website - Alex Peychev 15:54:46 09/11/07 ( 0)
32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 09:17:09 09/11/07 ( 23)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Alex Peychev 16:23:00 09/11/07 ( 15)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 18:16:08 09/11/07 ( 14)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Alex Peychev 18:46:29 09/11/07 ( 13)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - PaulN 21:33:22 09/12/07 ( 8)
- That's just crazy talk - Sordidman 07:07:28 09/13/07 ( 3)
- RE: That's just crazy talk - PaulN 11:37:44 09/13/07 ( 2)
- I've been a philosophy student for a lot of years now... - Sordidman 12:01:37 09/13/07 ( 1)
- Thats Cool, thanks. (nt) - PaulN 12:49:58 09/13/07 ( 0)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 23:14:05 09/12/07 ( 2)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - PaulN 00:10:08 09/13/07 ( 1)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 17:14:31 09/13/07 ( 0)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Alex Peychev 21:53:23 09/12/07 ( 0)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 19:51:41 09/11/07 ( 3)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Alex Peychev 21:59:06 09/12/07 ( 2)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Charles Hansen 23:23:39 09/12/07 ( 1)
- RE: 32 bits = exaggerated marketing claim - Alex Peychev 23:38:34 09/12/07 ( 0)
measured dynamic range is not "resolution in bits" - Ric Schultz 11:24:09 09/11/07 ( 6)
- Agree with some points, disagree with others - Charles Hansen 18:35:37 09/11/07 ( 2)
- RE: Agree with some points, disagree with others - Ric Schultz 20:29:12 09/11/07 ( 1)
- RE: Agree with some points, disagree with others - Charles Hansen 20:47:13 09/11/07 ( 0)
RE: measured dynamic range is not "resolution in bits" - Awe-d-o-file 17:39:49 09/11/07 ( 2)
- RE: measured dynamic range is not "resolution in bits" - Charles Hansen 18:40:32 09/11/07 ( 1)
- RE: measured dynamic range is not "resolution in bits" - Awe-d-o-file 18:52:10 09/13/07 ( 0)
If it's really a 32 bit DAC, then why are the specs so poor? - Allen Wright 00:37:12 09/11/07 ( 0)
Why is this interesting? - Jon L 21:24:01 09/10/07 ( 0)